Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42316480›Full record

ReviewComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2026

Antioxidants in Plant-Based Food Matrices: From Structure-Activity and Degradation Kinetics to Formulation Design.

Márcio Vargas-Ramella, Carmen Silvia Favaro-Trindade, Bárbara Miranda-Vilela, Mariana Estefanuto-Costa, Marina Franco-Brito, Bibiana Alves Dos Santos, Paulo Cezar Bastianello Campagnol

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Márcio Vargas-RamellaDepartamento de Ciências Biológicas, Centro de Educação Superior da Região Sul-CERES, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina-UDESC, Laguna, Santa Catarina, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8101-9333
Carmen Silvia Favaro-TrindadeDepartamento de Engenharia de Alimentos, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos (FZEA), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7642-7631
Bárbara Miranda-VilelaDepartamento de Ciências Biológicas, Centro de Educação Superior da Região Sul-CERES, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina-UDESC, Laguna, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Mariana Estefanuto-CostaDepartamento de Ciências Biológicas, Centro de Educação Superior da Região Sul-CERES, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina-UDESC, Laguna, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Marina Franco-BritoDepartamento de Ciências Biológicas, Centro de Educação Superior da Região Sul-CERES, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina-UDESC, Laguna, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Bibiana Alves Dos SantosDepartamento de Tecnologia e Ciência dos Alimentos, Centro de Ciências Rurais, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8892-6446
Paulo Cezar Bastianello CampagnolDepartamento de Tecnologia e Ciência dos Alimentos, Centro de Ciências Rurais, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7404-5610

Funding

Article Processing ChargeCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorUniversidade do Estado de Santa Catarina
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-based antioxidants are widely incorporated into foods to retard oxidative deterioration and to deliver health-related benefits. Yet, their in-product and in vivo performance frequently diverges from predictions based on solution-phase chemical assays, because matrix interactions, processing history, and host metabolism reshape both stability and bioactivity. This review integrates molecular mechanisms, structure-activity relationships (SARs), and degradation kinetics with food-matrix and human-relevance considerations to explain when, where, and how plant-based antioxidants act. Evidence is collated across polyphenols, carotenoids, tocopherols and tocotrienols, and selected alkaloids, linking hydrogen-atom, single-electron, and proton-coupled transfer pathways. Together, with those evidences, transition-metal chelation, interactions with proteins and polysaccharides, interfacial partitioning in emulsions, and metal-catalyzed oxidation are discussed. The influence of conventional and emerging processing, storage, and delivery systems (Pickering and double emulsions, spray drying/chilling, complex coacervation, ionic gelation) on antioxidant stability, localization, and bioaccessibility is also examined. Across systems, efficacy is governed less by intrinsic reactivity or nominal polarity than by effective interfacial concentration, partitioning behavior, and metal management. Encapsulation, when matched to matrix and process, improves antioxidant retention. Combinations of antioxidants may act cooperatively under one set of conditions and become antagonistic, or even pro-oxidant, under high oxygen availability or at suboptimal molar ratios. In this review, solution-phase rankings (DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, ORAC) are interpreted as descriptors of intrinsic reactivity. They cannot, on their own, predict performance in real food matrices or the post-digestion metabolite pool reaching systemic circulation. Effective use of plant antioxidants in foods therefore requires that formulation choices be informed by interfacial kinetics, food-component interactions during digestion, gut-microbiota metabotypes, and biomarker-validated estimates of dietary intake.

Indexed as

AntioxidantsPlantsHumansKineticsStructure-Activity RelationshipAntioxidants

Identifiers

PMID42316480
PMCPMC13279865

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.