Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42317469›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026

Empathy-related individual differences in brain responses to robot and human pain.

Jenna H Chin, Kerstin S Haring, Daniel Pittman, Pilyoung Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jenna H ChinDepartment of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, CO, United States.
Kerstin S HaringDepartment of Computer Science, University of Denver, Denver, CO, United States.
Daniel Pittman *Department of Computer Science, University of Denver, Denver, CO, United States.
Pilyoung KimDepartment of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, CO, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Robots are increasingly implemented across diverse social contexts. Empathy is one construct that has gained focus in human-robot interaction (HRI) research. While previous studies have demonstrated neural activation for explicit depictions of robot pain, this work has primarily used a limited range of human and robot stimuli, and it is less clear how humans perceive a broader range of faces. Methods: The current study examined the neural correlates of human empathy for robot pain using functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) and a diverse range of human and robot face stimuli. In Study 1, we conducted an online survey with Results: In Study 1, results found that the painful touch condition stimuli successfully elicited the intended emotion. In Study 2, there were no significant differences in brain responses to human pain in comparison to robot pain, though results demonstrated behavioral sensitivity to both the touch and face conditions. Neuroimaging analyses also suggest that individual differences in self-oriented empathy is linked to neural activation for human and robot pain. Discussion: The current work contributes our understanding of the role of individual differences in self-rated empathy in shaping neural responses to robot pain and highlights the importance of tailoring HRI to the emotional and empathetic responses of users. We did not find evidence for significant differences in neural responses to human pain stimuli in comparison to robot pain stimuli, despite significant differences in behavioral pain ratings. This suggests a discrepancy between brain and behavior necessitating further inquiry.

Indexed as

empathyfNIRShuman–robot interactionprefrontal cortexsocial robotics

Identifiers

PMID42317469
PMCPMC13272435

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.