ArticleHealth care transitions2026
An e-health transition intervention for youth with brain-based disabilities: Pilot and feasibility results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Health care transitions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Youth with brain-based disabilities (BBD) need tailored support when preparing for adult healthcare. We originally designed a full randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test whether the MyREADY Transition™ BBD App improved transition readiness among youth aged 15-17 years with autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, fetal alcohol spectrum disorder, or spina bifida. Due to slow recruitment, the full RCT was halted and pivoted to a stand-alone pilot and feasibility trial. Methods: This mixed method, patient-oriented pilot RCT (2019-2022, Canada) evaluated process, resource, management, and scientific feasibility, along with engagement with the App. Scientific feasibility focused on self-management outcomes (TRAQ and Transition-Q) among 43 youth (mean age 15.9 ± 0.8; 19 intervention, 24 control). Interviews and surveys provided additional perspectives on feasibility and user experience. Results: Recruitment achieved only 43 of the planned 264 participants, and App engagement was modest. Almost all intervention participants logged into the App at least once, but on average completed less than one third of the curriculum. Qualitative findings suggested the App's content was relevant and useful. Participants, caregivers, and healthcare providers emphasized the need for tailored, collaborative approaches to transition preparation. Conclusion: Challenges included slow recruitment and limited sustained use of an e health intervention among youth with BBD. Despite the pivot, the trial generated pragmatic insights for future transition research. Youth and parent recommendations underscored the importance of customizable content and strategies that enhance motivation and engagement. Additional pilot work is needed to refine and optimize digital transition supports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.