ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Construction and prototype effect evaluation of a multi-agent collaborative system for operating room nursing.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop an operating room intelligent collaborative management system, define its intelligent auxiliary role for nursing teams, and evaluate its efficacy in process optimization, efficiency improvement, and clinical acceptance. Methods: Guided by standards like the Guidelines for Operating Room Nursing Practice, five position-mapped agents (scheduling, resource, early warning, quality control, interaction) were designed. The system integrates a Graph RAG-based knowledge engine, MindsDB-powered AutoML prediction engine, and an innovative function to automatically construct/visualize knowledge graphs from uploaded nursing documents, with a user-friendly human-machine interface adapted to operating room settings. Simulated scenario tests and a 5-point Likert scale survey (86 medical staff) were conducted. Results: The system achieved success rates of 95.0% (resource conflicts), 90.0% (emergency insertion), 85.0% (equipment failures), and 90.0% (special coordination), with average solution generation time of 22.3-41.6 s. Overall nursing satisfaction was (4.32 ± 0.51) points, with top scores in "process optimization perception" (4.40 ± 0.48) and "decision support value" (4.35 ± 0.52). Conclusion: Integrating knowledge-driven and data-driven intelligence, the system enables automatic knowledge graph construction and updates. As an effective digital assistant for nursing collaboration, its nurse-centric, operating room-adapted design has gained wide clinical recognition, offering a human-machine collaboration solution for intelligent nursing management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.