ArticleOphthalmology science2026
Intraoperative Anti-VEGF vs. Photocoagulation during Vitrectomy for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion with Vitreous Hemorrhage: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the effects of vitrectomy combined with intraoperative anti-VEGF therapy versus intraoperative sectoral retinal photocoagulation on the anatomical and functional outcomes of branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) complicated by vitreous hemorrhage (VH). Design: Randomized, parallel-group clinical trial. Participants: The study included 34 patients diagnosed with BRVO complicated by VH. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either intraoperative intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg ranibizumab (anti-VEGF group) or sectoral retinal photocoagulation (laser group) after vitrectomy. Postoperative assessments included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), visual field, and fluorescent angiography. Main Outcome Measures: Mean deviation (MD) of the visual field at 12 months and intergroup differences. Results: The average MD of the visual field in the anti-VEGF group was significantly lower than that in the laser group (-8.5 ± 4.6 dB vs. -15.1 ± 3.5 dB, Conclusions: Intraoperative anti-VEGF therapy is a safe and effective alternative to sector retinal laser photocoagulation for patients with BRVO complicated by VH undergoing vitrectomy. This approach offers the advantage of preserving the visual field and avoiding CV damage associated with laser treatment. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.