ArticleObesity science & practice2026
Identification and Optimization of Risk for Stroke With Abdominal Obesity Patients: Insights From NHANES 2005-2018.
Article in Obesity science & practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification and Optimization of Risk for Stroke With Abdominal Obesity Patients: Insights From NHANES 2005-2018.Obesity science & practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Stroke is the leading cause of disability worldwide, and it is now estimated that one in four individuals may experience a stroke during their lifetime. Early detection and rapid access to treatment can save lives and improve recovery. This study aimed to identify and characterize the potential influencing factors in patients with obesity who have had strokes. Methods: The research screened the 2005-2018 NHANES database and analyzed potential risk factors in eligible stroke patients with abdominal obesity using 10 machine model learning. Multivariable-adjusted least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis, and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) plots were used to identify important risk factors for obese individuals who have experienced strokes. Results: The 8764 eligible individuals were divided into training set (6,134) and validation set (2,630) for predictive model development. In addition, the random forest model achieved the highest performance in predicting stroke incidence (area under the curve: 0.823) and all-cause mortality (area under the curve: 0.741). The SHAP values showed that age was the highest predictor followed by hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, smoking history, alcohol use, total cholesterol (TC), TyG-BMI, and cardiovascular artery disease (CDAI). Conclusions: TyG-BMI, CDAI, and TC are innovative and clinically viable predictive biomarkers for stroke in patients with abdominal obesity, exhibiting age- and gender-specific effects that are particularly pronounced in elderly females. These findings provide an evidence-based basis for personalized stroke risk assessment and targeted prevention strategies in the growing abdominally obese population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.