ReviewCureus2026
Artificial Intelligence Applied to the Brain-Gut Axis in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Advancing Toward Clinical Translation.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional Foods and Micro- and Nanoplastics: Advances in Precision Nutritional Medicine for Oral-Gut-Brain Axis Health.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Gastrointestinal endoscopy for physiological assessment in functional gastrointestinal disorders: a perspective.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of the most common functional gut disorders affecting the global population, characterized by chronic abdominal pain and altered bowel habits in the absence of structural disease. The brain-gut-microbiota axis, a bidirectional network integrating central nervous system processing, enteric and autonomic function, immune signaling, and gut microbial ecology, provides a mechanistic framework that helps explain the substantial symptom heterogeneity and variable treatment response observed across patients. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) approaches offer the ability to model complex, nonlinear relationships across high-dimensional biological datasets generated from this axis, including microbiome composition profiles, resting-state functional MRI connectivity matrices, multiomics data layers, and psychological and clinical feature sets. This narrative review evaluated primary human studies applying AI and ML to brain-gut axis data in IBS, identified through structured searches of PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus supplemented by citation chaining, with literature included up to April 2026. Across microbiome profiling, neuroimaging, multiomics integration, and psychological feature modeling, ML approaches have demonstrated proof-of-concept performance for IBS classification and, in a smaller number of studies, for prediction of clinically meaningful outcomes, including cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) response. A notable early signal is the integration of baseline microbiome and brain features to predict CBT response, with high reported discrimination, although these results are derived from small, single-center cohorts with only internal validation and should be regarded as hypothesis-generating. The current evidence base is limited by small single-center cohorts, reliance on internal validation, healthy-control comparators, limited external replication, and substantial overfitting and data-leakage risk in high-dimensional small-sample settings. AI and ML applications in IBS are promising but remain exploratory and are not yet suitable for routine clinical use. Clinical translation will require larger multicenter datasets, harmonized preprocessing pipelines, external validation, calibration reporting, and evaluation against clinically realistic comparators and decision points.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.