ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
The relationship of rice yield and quality with the utilization of temperature and light resources in regions at different altitudes.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Existing studies on the effects of altitude on rice yield and quality have drawn different conclusions. However, the underlying mechanisms of how altitude-induced differences in the utilization of temperature and light resources drive the differential responses of yield and quality formation remain unclear. In particular, the synergistic effects of the ecological adaptability of rice varieties, altitude-mediated distribution of light and temperature resources, and nitrogen regulation on rice yield and grain quality have not yet been clearly elucidated. Methods: A two-year field experiment was conducted in low-altitude (520.70 m) and high-altitude (1640.56 m) rice-growing regions using two rice varieties with differential altitude responsiveness of core agronomic traits, Meixiangzhan 2 and Yunjing 39. Under a nitrogen (N) application rate of 150 kg N ha-1, three N management strategies with basal: tiller: panicle fertilizer ratios of 5:3:2 (N1), 3:3:4 (N2), and 3:1:6 (N3) were implemented, with a no-N treatment (N0) as the control. Results: Altitude, variety, and N management significantly affected grain yield, rice quality, and the utilization of temperature and light resources. Compared with the low-altitude site, the rice growth period at high altitude was prolonged by 27.25-30.77 days, while effective panicles and seed-setting rates increased by 16.53%-27.37% and 2.71%-6.68%, respectively, contributing to a 4.10%-4.12% yield increase. Meixiangzhan 2 showed higher yields at low altitude (4.84%-8.12%) but significantly lower yields at high altitude (19.80%-25.13%) compared with Yunjing 39. High altitude improved grain quality by increasing head rice rate (5.10%-9.42%) and reducing chalkiness (2.87%-6.38%), although lower temperatures from the heading to maturity stage increased amylose content (13.71%-19.82%) and reduced taste value (2.29%-5.22%). Among the N treatments, N2 consistently improved both yield and rice quality of two varieties at different altitudes. Discussion: Optimizing temperature and light resource allocation during key growth stages-particularly increasing the effective accumulated temperature over the entire rice growth period, the diurnal temperature range from heading to maturity stage, the average daily sunshine hours, and the solar radiation-is critical for achieving high yield, high quality, and efficient resource utilization across altitudes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.