ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Rebuilding spinal circuit function after spinal cord injury through a patient-specific interneuron precision model.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal interneurons constitute the physiological core of spinal circuitry, integrating excitatory and inhibitory inputs to generate the rhythmic patterns that drive locomotor, postural, and autonomic control. Their developmental logic, molecular diversity, and adaptive plasticity make them central determinants of functional recovery after spinal cord injury (SCI). Yet most regenerative strategies continue to emphasize cellular replacement rather than the restoration of the physiological integrity of spinal networks. In this article, we reframe spinal repair as the restoration of interneuron-mediated circuit organization rather than cellular replacement alone. We synthesize current insights into how embryonic patterning programs defined by Sonic Hedgehog (SHH), Wnt, and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) gradients, refined by Notch and retinoic acid signaling, and consolidated by axon guidance cues, establish interneuron diversity, connectivity, and network symmetry that together encode the logic of motor coordination. SCI disrupts this developmental logic, fragmenting excitatory and inhibitory balance and desynchronizing rhythmic modules, while residual circuits retain latent capacity for resynchronization through plasticity and neuromodulation. Building upon this developmental and physiological continuum, we propose the Patient-Specific Interneuron Precision Model (PIPM), a feedback-informed conceptual framework that links patient-specific biological states, including progenitor competence, morphogen sensitivity, metabolic tone, inflammatory burden, and lesion-specific circuit preservation, to circuit-level function and recovery potential. Frameworks such as the PIPM may help integrate molecular, physiological, and clinical dimensions of recovery, providing a path toward more personalized strategies for treating SCI through restoration of interneuron-mediated network organization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.