ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Differential associations of novel metaflammation indices with incident stroke across traditional Chinese medicine constitutions: a retrospective community-based cohort study of older adults.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To examine associations between novel metaflammation indices (LHR, MHR, NHR, PHR) and first stroke risk in community-dwelling older adults, and assess their differences across Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) constitution types. Methods: A retrospective cohort study included 2,999 stroke-free adults (≥65 years) followed for 4 years. Data were collected through standardized questionnaires, physical examinations, and blood tests. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the associations between these indices and incident stroke. Stratified analyses were conducted according to TCM constitution types. Results: During the follow-up period, 36 incident stroke cases were recorded. After multivariable adjustment, LHR (HR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.09-2.61) and PHR (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.01) were significantly positively associated with stroke risk in the overall population. Individuals with high-risk biased constitutions had a significantly elevated stroke risk (HR = 3.42, 95% CI: 1.32-8.80). Stratified analysis suggested that the associations of LHR and PHR with stroke were statistically significant in the balanced constitution and low-risk biased constitution subgroups, but not in the high-risk biased constitution subgroup. However, no significant interaction was observed. Conclusion: LHR and PHR may be associated with incident stroke in community-dwelling older adults, and their associations may vary across TCM constitution types. Therefore, integrating traditional risk factors, metaflammation indices, and TCM constitution identification might contribute to developing a more refined and personalized stroke risk assessment strategy. However, no significant interaction was observed, indicating that these variations should be interpreted cautiously and require further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.