ArticleJournal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques2026
Photon-counting detector computed tomography angiogram more accurately characterizes lower extremity runoff than traditional computed tomograph angiogram.
Article in Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, we compared lower extremity photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT; n = 43) and conventional energy-integrating detector CT angiograms (EID-CTA; n = 46) with traditional on-table angiograms to assess whether there was a difference in the ability to characterize the target tibial artery (TA) for potential lower extremity bypass between imaging modalities. In PCD-CT angiography vs angiography, a different TA was identified in two patients (4.6%), whereas in EID-CTA vs angiography, a different TA was identified in 10 patients (21.7%;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.