SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
Effects of aromatherapy on objective physiological outcomes in adult ICU patients: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Aromatherapy has been proposed as a non-pharmacological adjunctive intervention in critical care settings; however, evidence regarding its effects on objective outcome measures remains inconclusive. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of aromatherapy in modulating objective physiological and biochemical markers in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients. We hypothesized that the controlled ICU environment would facilitate rigorous measurement of both physiological parameters and biochemical stress markers. Methods: A systematic search was conducted using a novel approach combining lexical database searching (PubMed) and AI-powered semantic search strategies (Elicit, Undermind). Randomized controlled trials examining aromatherapy effects on physiological parameters in critically ill and cardiac patients were included. Outcomes were categorized as cardiovascular, respiratory, and non-cardiovascular/non-respiratory parameters. Subgroup analyses were performed by essential oil type. Results: Eighteen studies comprising 1236 participants were included. Aromatherapy demonstrated moderate effects on cardiovascular parameters (systolic blood pressure: 50% success rate, 5-22 mmHg reductions; diastolic blood pressure: 50%, 3.7-14 mmHg; heart rate: 44%, up to 20 bpm) but limited effects on respiratory parameters (respiratory rate: 25%; peripheral oxygen saturation: 12.5%), with the exception of eucalyptus oil, which showed 75% success for respiratory outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients. Non-cardiovascular/non-respiratory outcomes demonstrated the highest efficacy: anxiety (86%), sleep quality (100%), pain (100%), and sedation outcomes (100%). Subgroup analysis revealed essential oil blends achieved superior cardiovascular and psychological outcomes (100%) compared to lavender alone (64% cardiovascular; 71% anxiety/sedation). Contrary to our hypothesis, no studies measured biochemical stress markers such as cortisol or catecholamines, representing a significant gap in the evidence base. A notable finding was the disparity between evidence certainty: high for anxiety reduction versus low/very low for physiological outcomes, highlighting inadequate control for ICU-specific confounders in existing trials. Conclusion: Aromatherapy may serve as a safe adjunctive intervention in critically ill patients, with potential cardiovascular benefits requiring cautious interpretation and strong effects on anxiety and sleep outcomes. The absence of biochemical outcome measurements and inadequate control for ICU-specific confounders limits mechanistic understanding and causal inference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.