ReviewClinical and translational science2026
From Pharmacodynamic Biomarker to Evaluating Treatment Response: Biomarkers in Primary Mitochondrial Diseases.
Review in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary mitochondrial diseases (PMDs) result from genetic variants in nuclear DNA and mitochondrial DNA which commonly lead to aberrant oxidative phosphorylation. The clinical complexity, often attributed to the underlying genetics, includes several distinct syndromes (e.g., Barth syndrome; Pearson syndrome; Mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes), some with overlapping symptoms. PMDs are highly heterogenous and affect multiple organs and tissues, prominently those with high energy demand such as muscle and neurologic tissues. Disease-modifying therapies for PMDs approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration are few and disease-specific, and treatment remains largely supportive in nature. The lack of robust biomarkers contributes to challenges associated with quantifying treatment responses in drug development. Recognizing this area of critical need, we sought to understand the landscape of molecular biomarkers that may inform treatment response, support clinical trials, and may be useful for regulatory decision-making. In this review, we assess the extent of evidence and challenges for each biomarker. We propose considerations for future biomarker development to measure treatment response and facilitate early drug development in PMDs by guiding dose selection and trial enrichment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.