SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2026

Long-term effects of weight-reducing drugs in people with hypertension.

Ulrike Spary-Kainz, Nicole Posch, Christina Radl-Karimi, Klaus Jeitler, Cornelia Krenn, Andrea Siebenhofer, Andrea Berghold, Karl Horvath, Sebastian Winterholer, Thomas Semlitsch

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2026. The graph read 9 numbers from its abstract, feeding 3 cells of the map: it . Not yet cited in PubMed.

9numbers the graph read from it
3cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0.5241 · no effect
All-cause mortalityno clear difference · against placebo · obesity, hypertensionfeeds one cell of the map
RR 0.990.70 to 1.40
Naltrexone/bupropion versus placebo Naltrexone/bupropion may have little to no effect on all-cause mortality (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.40; 1 trial, 8283 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and cardiovascular morbidity (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.41; 1 trial, 8283 participants; very low-certainty evidence) compared to placebo, but the evidence is very uncertain.
Adverse events & safetyno clear difference · against placebo · obesity, hypertensionfeeds one cell of the map
RR 1.130.84 to 1.54
There may be little to no difference in all adverse events (AEs) between orlistat and placebo, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.54; 2 trials, 1386 participants; very low-certainty evidence).
Cardiovascular eventsno clear difference · against placebo · obesity, hypertensionfeeds one cell of the map
RR 2.390.82 to 6.69
Phentermine/topiramate may have little to no effect on cardiovascular morbidity compared to placebo, but the evidence is very uncertain (treatment-emergent cardiac events: high-dose versus placebo: RR 2.39, 95% CI 0.82 to 6.69; 1 trial, 1044 participants; low-dose versus placebo: RR 1.51, 95% CI 0.43 to 5.27; 1 trial, 785 participants; both very low-certainty evidence).
Cardiovascular eventsno clear difference · against placebo · obesity, hypertensionfeeds one cell of the map
RR 1.510.43 to 5.27
Phentermine/topiramate may have little to no effect on cardiovascular morbidity compared to placebo, but the evidence is very uncertain (treatment-emergent cardiac events: high-dose versus placebo: RR 2.39, 95% CI 0.82 to 6.69; 1 trial, 1044 participants; low-dose versus placebo: RR 1.51, 95% CI 0.43 to 5.27; 1 trial, 785 participants; both very low-certainty evidence).
Adverse events & safetyno clear difference · against placebo · obesity, hypertensionfeeds one cell of the map
RR 0.850.49 to 1.48
Phentermine/topiramate may have little to no effect on SAEs compared to placebo, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.48; 1 trial, 1305 participants; very low-certainty evidence).
Adverse events & safetyfavours the comparator · against placebo · obesity, hypertensionfeeds one cell of the map
RR 1.131.08 to 1.20
Phentermine/topiramate probably increases all AEs compared to placebo (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.20; 1 trial, 1305 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).
Adverse events & safetyfavours the comparator · against placebo · obesity, hypertensionfeeds one cell of the map
RR 1.691.58 to 1.80
There is probably little to no difference between naltrexone/bupropion and placebo in SAEs (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.14; 1 trial, 8283 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), but naltrexone/bupropion probably increases all AEs compared to placebo (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.58 to 1.80; 1 trial, 8283 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).
Adverse events & safetyno clear difference · against placebo · obesity, hypertensionfeeds one cell of the map
RR 1.050.96 to 1.14
There is probably little to no difference between naltrexone/bupropion and placebo in SAEs (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.14; 1 trial, 8283 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), but naltrexone/bupropion probably increases all AEs compared to placebo (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.58 to 1.80; 1 trial, 8283 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).
All-cause mortalityno clear difference · against placebo · obesity, hypertensionfeeds one cell of the map
RR 1.110.87 to 1.41
Naltrexone/bupropion versus placebo Naltrexone/bupropion may have little to no effect on all-cause mortality (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.40; 1 trial, 8283 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and cardiovascular morbidity (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.41; 1 trial, 8283 participants; very low-certainty evidence) compared to placebo, but the evidence is very uncertain.

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Anti-obesity drugs×adverse events & safety

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

No other readable study in this cell yet. This paper is the evidence.

Belief with this paperNo claim has been compiled for this cell yet.

Anti-obesity drugs×all-cause mortality

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

No other readable study in this cell yet. This paper is the evidence.

Belief with this paperNo claim has been compiled for this cell yet.

Anti-obesity drugs×cardiovascular events

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

No other readable study in this cell yet. This paper is the evidence.

Belief with this paperNo claim has been compiled for this cell yet.
4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

6 · The record

Corrections and comments

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ulrike Spary-KainzInstitute of General Practice and Evidence-Based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Nicole PoschInstitute of General Practice and Evidence-Based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7939-1435
Christina Radl-KarimiInstitute of General Practice and Evidence-Based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Klaus JeitlerInstitute of General Practice and Evidence-Based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Cornelia KrennInstitute of General Practice and Evidence-Based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Andrea SiebenhoferInstitute of General Practice and Evidence-Based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Andrea BergholdInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Karl HorvathInstitute of General Practice and Evidence-Based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Sebastian WinterholerInstitute of General Practice and Evidence-Based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Thomas SemlitschInstitute of General Practice and Evidence-Based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

rationaleLong-term weight management drugs have the potential to reduce body weight and blood pressure in obese or overweight individuals. Being overweight or obese is often associated with hypertension, which is linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. The effects of weight-reducing drugs on patient-relevant outcomes, especially in people with hypertension, are currently unclear. This review is the fourth update of one first published in July 2009.

objectivesPrimary objective To assess the effects of drugs approved for long-term weight management on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular morbidity and adverse events in adults with essential hypertension. Secondary objective To assess the effects of drugs approved for long-term weight management on changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and body weight in adults with essential hypertension. SEARCH

methodsFor this updated review, the Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases to 22 April 2024: the Cochrane Hypertension Specialised Register, Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and trial registries, with no language restrictions. We also checked references, searched citations, and contacted manufacturers and authors of relevant papers. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of at least 24 weeks' duration that compared approved long-term weight management drugs to placebo in non-pregnant adults with essential hypertension. OUTCOMES: Critical outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular morbidity and adverse events. Important outcomes were changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and changes in body weight. RISK OF BIAS: We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB 1 tool. SYNTHESIS

methodsWe used standard Cochrane methods. For meta-analyses, we used risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcomes. We undertook both fixed-effect and random-effects meta-analysis, presenting the random-effects results. We assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE. INCLUDED STUDIES: We identified no additional trials of drugs included in the previous version of the review. We included two new RCTs evaluating the recently approved drugs semaglutide and tirzepatide. In total, eight RCTs reported results on different weight-reducing drugs compared to placebo in people with hypertension (approximately 13,000 hypertensive participants in total). The interventions evaluated were orlistat (4 trials, 3132 participants), phentermine/topiramate (1 trial, 1305 participants), naltrexone/bupropion (1 trial, 8283 participants), semaglutide (1 trial, 274 participants) and tirzepatide (1 trial, 153 participants with stage 2 hypertension and 635 participants taking antihypertensive medication). Study duration ranged from six to 48 months. Seven of the eight trials were funded by the pharmaceutical industry. We were unable to include any liraglutide results, as no RCTs have provided separate data for participants with hypertension. Rimonabant, sibutramine and lorcaserin are no longer considered relevant, since their marketing approval has been withdrawn. SYNTHESIS OF

resultsOrlistat versus placebo Orlistat may have little to no effect on all-cause mortality compared to placebo, but the evidence is very uncertain (3 versus 0 deaths; 3 trials, 1488 participants; very low certainty evidence). Orlistat may have little to no effect on cardiovascular morbidity compared to placebo, but the evidence is very uncertain (1.9% versus 0.7% in one trial and 17% versus 19% in another trial; 2 trials, 1721 participants; very low certainty evidence). Orlistat probably increases serious adverse events (SAEs) compared to placebo (RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.91; 3 trials, 1476 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There may be little to no difference in all adverse events (AEs) between orlistat and placebo, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.54; 2 trials, 1386 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Phentermine/topiramate versus placebo Phentermine/topiramate may have little to no effect on all-cause mortality compared to placebo, but the evidence is very uncertain (no deaths in either group; 1 trial, 1305 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Phentermine/topiramate may have little to no effect on cardiovascular morbidity compared to placebo, but the evidence is very uncertain (treatment-emergent cardiac events: high-dose versus placebo: RR 2.39, 95% CI 0.82 to 6.69; 1 trial, 1044 participants; low-dose versus placebo: RR 1.51, 95% CI 0.43 to 5.27; 1 trial, 785 participants; both very low-certainty evidence). Phentermine/topiramate may have little to no effect on SAEs compared to placebo, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.48; 1 trial, 1305 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Phentermine/topiramate probably increases all AEs compared to placebo (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.20; 1 trial, 1305 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Naltrexone/bupropion versus placebo Naltrexone/bupropion may have little to no effect on all-cause mortality (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.40; 1 trial, 8283 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and cardiovascular morbidity (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.41; 1 trial, 8283 participants; very low-certainty evidence) compared to placebo, but the evidence is very uncertain. There is probably little to no difference between naltrexone/bupropion and placebo in SAEs (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.14; 1 trial, 8283 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), but naltrexone/bupropion probably increases all AEs compared to placebo (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.58 to 1.80; 1 trial, 8283 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Semaglutide versus placebo No results were reported for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, SAEs and AEs. Tirzepatide versus placebo No results were reported for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, SAEs and AEs. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere have been multiple developments in the domain of medications for long-term weight reduction in recent years. Several pharmaceutical products have been removed from the market due to safety concerns, whilst new drugs have been introduced. Our critical outcomes of death and cardiovascular complications were not the focus of the trials included in this review but were sometimes presented as part of an 'adverse events' outcome, with the resultant data providing only very low certainty evidence. Overall, the evidence for people with hypertension remains insufficient to draw conclusions regarding the benefits of pharmacological weight loss in terms of reducing the risk of mortality or cardiovascular morbidity. Further trials are needed. Moreover, separate results for participants with hypertension should be made available from any completed trials involving both normotensive and hypertensive people.

fundingThis Cochrane review had no dedicated funding. REGISTRATION: Protocol and previous version DOIs: 10.1002/14651858.CD007654; 10.1002/14651858.CD007654.pub2; 10.1002/14651858.CD007654.pub3; 10.1002/14651858.CD007654.pub4; 10.1002/14651858.CD007654.pub5.

Indexed as

Anti-Obesity AgentsHypertensionObesityWeight LossAdultBlood PressureBupropionCardiovascular DiseasesCause of DeathCyclobutanesDrug CombinationsFructoseHumansLactonesNaltrexoneOrlistatAnti-Obesity AgentsBupropionCyclobutanesDrug CombinationsFructoseLactonesNaltrexoneNaltrexone-Bupropion combinationOrlistatPhentermineRimonabantSemaglutidesibutramineTirzepatideTopiramate

Identifiers

PMID42318855
PMCPMC13281032

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.