Evidence mapPaperPMID 42318967Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular medicine2026

Arsenic exposure and skin cancer: Mechanisms, clinical evidence and public health implications (Review).

Dimitrios A Andreikos, Michael Aschner, Dimitrios C Ziogas, Aristidis Tsatsakis, Demetrios A Spandidos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dimitrios A AndreikosFirst Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Michael AschnerDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY 10461, USA.
Dimitrios C ZiogasFirst Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Aristidis TsatsakisLaboratory of Toxicology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece.
Demetrios A SpandidosLaboratory of Clinical Virology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin is among the most frequent sites of cancer diagnosis, and the global incidence of skin cancer continues to rise despite extensive public health initiatives and preventive strategies. Arsenic, a ubiquitous environmental metalloid classified as a Group 1 carcinogen, remains an important concern due to widespread exposure through contaminated drinking water, food sources and occupational contact. Arsenic‑associated skin carcinogenesis involves complex, interdependent molecular processes and has been linked to the disruption of redox signalling, altered DNA damage signalling and repair responses as well as epigenetic reprogramming. In keratinocytes, arsenic perturbs redox and stress‑response pathways and may disrupt genome maintenance and cellular stress signalling in experimental systems. Arsenic may also alter microRNA networks and affect telomere and mitochondrial homeostasis, although the contribution of these processes to malignant transformation remains context‑dependent; in melanoma, the carcinogenic mechanisms of arsenic are less well characterized. Clinically, arsenic is recognized as a carcinogen in non‑melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and evidence from high‑exposure endemic regions, together with occupational cohorts, suggest a dose‑responsive association. For melanoma, clinical evidence is more heterogeneous and subject to substantial potential confounding, although some studies suggest modest risk elevation in high‑exposure or occupational settings. Collectively, convergent mechanistic, experimental and epidemiological data support arsenic as an independent carcinogen, particularly in NMSC. These findings underscore the need for heightened clinical vigilance, particularly in exposed populations, and call for renewed public health strategies and regulatory frameworks to mitigate the persistent global burden of arsenic‑associated skin cancer.

Indexed as

ArsenicEnvironmental ExposurePublic HealthSkin NeoplasmsAnimalsHumansMelanomaNon-Melanoma Skin NeoplasmsArsenicarseniccutaneous carcinogenesisheavy metalsmelanomanon‑melanoma skin cancerskin cancer

Identifiers

PMID42318967
PMCPMC13358204

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.