ReviewInternational journal of molecular medicine2026
Arsenic exposure and skin cancer: Mechanisms, clinical evidence and public health implications (Review).
Review in International journal of molecular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin is among the most frequent sites of cancer diagnosis, and the global incidence of skin cancer continues to rise despite extensive public health initiatives and preventive strategies. Arsenic, a ubiquitous environmental metalloid classified as a Group 1 carcinogen, remains an important concern due to widespread exposure through contaminated drinking water, food sources and occupational contact. Arsenic‑associated skin carcinogenesis involves complex, interdependent molecular processes and has been linked to the disruption of redox signalling, altered DNA damage signalling and repair responses as well as epigenetic reprogramming. In keratinocytes, arsenic perturbs redox and stress‑response pathways and may disrupt genome maintenance and cellular stress signalling in experimental systems. Arsenic may also alter microRNA networks and affect telomere and mitochondrial homeostasis, although the contribution of these processes to malignant transformation remains context‑dependent; in melanoma, the carcinogenic mechanisms of arsenic are less well characterized. Clinically, arsenic is recognized as a carcinogen in non‑melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and evidence from high‑exposure endemic regions, together with occupational cohorts, suggest a dose‑responsive association. For melanoma, clinical evidence is more heterogeneous and subject to substantial potential confounding, although some studies suggest modest risk elevation in high‑exposure or occupational settings. Collectively, convergent mechanistic, experimental and epidemiological data support arsenic as an independent carcinogen, particularly in NMSC. These findings underscore the need for heightened clinical vigilance, particularly in exposed populations, and call for renewed public health strategies and regulatory frameworks to mitigate the persistent global burden of arsenic‑associated skin cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.