Trial reportThe journal of extra-corporeal technology2026
Evaluation of accuracy of platelet rich plasma preparation devices for cardiac surgery: A prospective, randomized, single blinded study.
Trial report in The journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundApplying platelet rich plasma (PRP) to the sternum immediately prior to approximation has been shown to enhance wound healing, lower the incidence of sternal wound infections, reduce costs associated with treating these infections and decrease post-operative pain scores. Multiple investigations have reported device specific outcomes regarding PRP preparation yields from healthy volunteer blood donors, all with initial platelet counts in the normal range. What is missing from the literature is how accurately PRP preparations reflect device-specific yield target values, particularly under the clinical conditions encountered routinely in the cardiac surgery arena.
methodsThe Magellan
resultsIndividual yields from each tested device demonstrated some degree of limited variability. However, both groups mean values achieved and slightly exceeded the target value of a six-fold increase; Magellan group (M = 6.58, SD = 1.33), Angel group (M = 6.31, SD = 0.93).
conclusionBoth devices, on average, appear capable of accurately preparing PRP to meet the specific target value of a six-fold increase over baseline under conditions routinely encountered in cardiac surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.