ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
Diet-induced thermogenesis does not differ after ingestion of an isoenergetic meal, whereas early-phase thermogenesis differed between athletes and non-athletes.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeHabitual exercise is considered to be one of the factors that influence diet-induced thermogenesis (DIT). Still, whether DIT differs between athletes and non-athletes remains unclear due to the effects of test meal's volume and nutritional composition. This study aimed to reveal whether the DIT of athletes differs from that of non-athletes after ingesting an isoenergetic meal with a typical nutritional composition in Japan.
methodsTwenty-six highly trained male athletes and 11 male non-athletes participated in this study. Measurements for determining DIT consisted of measurements of resting energy expenditure (REE) and postprandial energy expenditure by indirect calorimetry using the Douglas bag technique. After measuring REE, participants ingested a liquid test meal (600 kcal, 15% energy from protein, 25% energy from fat, and 60% energy from carbohydrates). Postprandial energy expenditure was measured up to 180 min. Thermogenesis at each postprandial time point was calculated by subtracting REE from postprandial energy expenditure. DIT over the 200-min period was determined from the area under the curve.
resultsThe results showed no significant differences in DIT and the percentage of DIT to test meal energy over the 200-min period. The thermogenesis at 20, 40, and 60 min after ingestion of the test meal were 27.5%, 25.8%, and 27.0% greater in athletes than in non-athletes, respectively.
conclusionThere were no differences in DIT between athletes and non-athletes, but thermogenesis was significantly higher in athletes during the first 60 min of the DIT measurement, indicating differences in digestion, absorption, or storage of nutrients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.