Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42319631›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2026

Bispecific CAR T and CAR NK cells in dual-threat immunotherapy: opportunities and challenges.

Ali Shahin Baher, Aya Khalid, Anahita Ganjalikhani Hakemi, Armita Ganjalikhani Hakemi, Mojdeh Soltani, Zohreh Saltanatpour, Andrey A Zamyatnin, Alessandro Parodi, Mazdak Ganjalikhani Hakemi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ali Shahin BaherInternational School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Aya KhalidInternational School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Anahita Ganjalikhani HakemiSchool of Pharmacy, Fenerbahçe University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Armita Ganjalikhani HakemiSchool of Pharmacy, Fenerbahçe University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mojdeh SoltaniDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Zohreh SaltanatpourTranslational Ophthalmology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Andrey A ZamyatninFaculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119234, Russia.
Alessandro ParodiFaculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119234, Russia.
Mazdak Ganjalikhani HakemiRegenerative and Restorative Medicine Research Center (REMER), Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technologies (SABITA), Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey. Mazdak.hakemi@medipol.edu.tr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antigen escape and intratumoral heterogeneity remain major barriers to durable responses in chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-based cancer immunotherapies. While single-antigen CAR-T cell therapies have achieved notable success in hematologic malignancies, relapse driven by antigen loss, lineage plasticity, and tumor evolution remains common, and efficacy in solid tumors is limited. Similar antigen-dependent limitations are also observed in other targeted immunotherapies, including bispecific antibodies, underscoring the broader challenge of achieving durable immune control. To address these challenges, bispecific and combinatorial CAR strategies have emerged to broaden antigen coverage, enhance tumor selectivity, and reduce immune evasion. This review examines the biological mechanisms underlying antigen escape and critically evaluates dual-targeting CAR architectures, including tandem CARs, dual-CAR systems, logic-gated designs, and inhibitory CARs. We distinguish between mechanistic rationale and clinically validated benefit, highlighting the heterogeneity of outcomes across studies and the limited evidence supporting consistent superiority over optimized monospecific approaches. We summarize preclinical and clinical evidence supporting bispecific CAR-T strategies, particularly in B-cell malignancies, while discussing challenges related to toxicity, manufacturing complexity, and translational scalability. We further evaluate CAR-engineered natural killer (CAR-NK) cells as a complementary platform. Their innate cytotoxicity, favorable safety profile, and compatibility with allogeneic manufacturing offer important translational advantages, although limitations in persistence, tumor infiltration, and clinical validation remain. Finally, we position CAR-based therapies within the evolving immunotherapy landscape, emphasizing therapeutic sequencing, combination strategies, potential cross-resistance, and the need to align CAR design and platform selection with tumor-specific patterns of antigen expression and immune escape.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveKiller Cells, NaturalNeoplasmsReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAnimalsAntibodies, BispecificHumansImmunotherapyT-LymphocytesAntibodies, BispecificReceptors, Chimeric AntigenBispecific CARCAR NK CellCAR T celliCARImmunotherapyTanCAR

Identifiers

PMID42319631

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.