ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
Bispecific CAR T and CAR NK cells in dual-threat immunotherapy: opportunities and challenges.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antigen escape and intratumoral heterogeneity remain major barriers to durable responses in chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-based cancer immunotherapies. While single-antigen CAR-T cell therapies have achieved notable success in hematologic malignancies, relapse driven by antigen loss, lineage plasticity, and tumor evolution remains common, and efficacy in solid tumors is limited. Similar antigen-dependent limitations are also observed in other targeted immunotherapies, including bispecific antibodies, underscoring the broader challenge of achieving durable immune control. To address these challenges, bispecific and combinatorial CAR strategies have emerged to broaden antigen coverage, enhance tumor selectivity, and reduce immune evasion. This review examines the biological mechanisms underlying antigen escape and critically evaluates dual-targeting CAR architectures, including tandem CARs, dual-CAR systems, logic-gated designs, and inhibitory CARs. We distinguish between mechanistic rationale and clinically validated benefit, highlighting the heterogeneity of outcomes across studies and the limited evidence supporting consistent superiority over optimized monospecific approaches. We summarize preclinical and clinical evidence supporting bispecific CAR-T strategies, particularly in B-cell malignancies, while discussing challenges related to toxicity, manufacturing complexity, and translational scalability. We further evaluate CAR-engineered natural killer (CAR-NK) cells as a complementary platform. Their innate cytotoxicity, favorable safety profile, and compatibility with allogeneic manufacturing offer important translational advantages, although limitations in persistence, tumor infiltration, and clinical validation remain. Finally, we position CAR-based therapies within the evolving immunotherapy landscape, emphasizing therapeutic sequencing, combination strategies, potential cross-resistance, and the need to align CAR design and platform selection with tumor-specific patterns of antigen expression and immune escape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42319631What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.