Evidence mapPaperPMID 42319672Full record

ReviewCardiovascular drugs and therapy2026

Cardiovascular Genetic Epidemiology in the Genome-Wide Era: From Association Discovery to Mechanistic Dissection and Clinical Translation.

Zhaoqi Yan, Xiangyi Pu, Yongyuan Cai, Qiaomin Wu, Xinai Zhang, Xing Chang, Jinfeng Liu, Yanli Wang, Zhiming Liu, Ruxiu Liu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhaoqi Yan *Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2988-9021
Xiangyi Pu *Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yongyuan Cai *Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Qiaomin Wu *Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xinai ZhangGuang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xing ChangGuang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jinfeng LiuGuang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yanli WangGuang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhiming LiuGuang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. liuzhiming2018@gamyy.cn.
Ruxiu LiuGuang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. liuruxiu1@163.com.

Funding

2025 Scientific and Technological Innovation Project for Graduate Students of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences KC2025005Academic Inheritance and Communication Project of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences CI2022E012XB
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite major advances in prevention and treatment, cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Cardiovascular genetic epidemiology has moved from family-based and candidate-gene studies to a genome-wide discipline supported by genome-wide association studies (GWAS), population-scale biobanks, whole-genome sequencing, and multi-omics resources. This narrative review examines how the field is shifting from locus discovery toward a continuous but still incomplete evidence chain that links variants to genes, cellular context, causal pathways, functional validation, and clinical use. We emphasize a central tension: cardiovascular genetics has been exceptionally successful at discovering associations, but robust mechanistic resolution and implementation-ready clinical translation remain uneven across diseases, populations, and use cases. We synthesize progress in coronary artery disease, blood pressure traits, atrial fibrillation, stroke, heart failure, inherited cardiovascular disorders, and intermediate phenotypes, and we distinguish established applications from promising but still emerging approaches such as polygenic risk scores, spatial omics, EHR-linked implementation, and genetically informed target prioritization. We also highlight persistent bottlenecks, including ancestry imbalance, noncoding locus interpretation, limited functional validation, imperfect polygenic score portability, data-governance constraints, and the need for privacy-preserving analytical frameworks. Overall, the next phase of cardiovascular genetic epidemiology will depend less on the mere accumulation of loci and more on rigorous evidence triangulation, context-specific functional testing, ancestry equity, and feasible clinical implementation pathways.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular genetic epidemiologyClinical translationGenome-wide association studiesMulti-omicsPost-GWAS interpretation

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.