ReviewCardiovascular drugs and therapy2026
Cardiovascular Genetic Epidemiology in the Genome-Wide Era: From Association Discovery to Mechanistic Dissection and Clinical Translation.
Review in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cellular Senescence in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy: Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Perspectives.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite major advances in prevention and treatment, cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Cardiovascular genetic epidemiology has moved from family-based and candidate-gene studies to a genome-wide discipline supported by genome-wide association studies (GWAS), population-scale biobanks, whole-genome sequencing, and multi-omics resources. This narrative review examines how the field is shifting from locus discovery toward a continuous but still incomplete evidence chain that links variants to genes, cellular context, causal pathways, functional validation, and clinical use. We emphasize a central tension: cardiovascular genetics has been exceptionally successful at discovering associations, but robust mechanistic resolution and implementation-ready clinical translation remain uneven across diseases, populations, and use cases. We synthesize progress in coronary artery disease, blood pressure traits, atrial fibrillation, stroke, heart failure, inherited cardiovascular disorders, and intermediate phenotypes, and we distinguish established applications from promising but still emerging approaches such as polygenic risk scores, spatial omics, EHR-linked implementation, and genetically informed target prioritization. We also highlight persistent bottlenecks, including ancestry imbalance, noncoding locus interpretation, limited functional validation, imperfect polygenic score portability, data-governance constraints, and the need for privacy-preserving analytical frameworks. Overall, the next phase of cardiovascular genetic epidemiology will depend less on the mere accumulation of loci and more on rigorous evidence triangulation, context-specific functional testing, ancestry equity, and feasible clinical implementation pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42319672What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.