ReviewIndian journal of pediatrics2026
Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Imaging: A Primer for Pediatric Clinicians.
Review in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping healthcare, and radiology is at the forefront for adoption. Increasing demand for imaging, complex protocols, quantitative image analysis, and workforce shortages drive AI development. However, clinical translation in pediatric imaging still lags its use in general radiology. Only a small number of approved tools carry explicit pediatric indications, and these focus on narrow tasks. In chest imaging, deep learning models can detect pneumonia, tuberculosis, and misplaced lines or tubes, though performance depends on pediatric-specific training and local validation. Automated bone age assessment is among the earliest and most widely adopted applications. Neuroimaging benefits include reduced acquisition times, lower contrast doses, and rapid triage of critical findings. Cardiovascular applications support congenital heart disease detection and functional assessment, while oncology applications are being explored for tumor characterization and segmentation for therapy planning. Beyond interpretation, AI can enhance workflow triage, structured reporting, and patient communication. Despite these advances, barriers remain for AI adoption. These include scarcity of pediatric datasets, limited prospective validation, workflow integration challenges, interpretability concerns, and complex ethical and legal issues unique to children. Integration with hospital systems is uneven, and routine monitoring and support are often missing. Pediatricians and surgeons should work with radiologists and data scientists to define use cases, curate datasets, validate performance, and set ethical guardrails. Future progress will depend on collaborative data sharing, robust validation, clinician engagement, child-centred guidelines, and human-centred design to ensure safe, equitable, and meaningful adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42319740What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.