Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42319740›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of pediatrics2026

Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Imaging: A Primer for Pediatric Clinicians.

Amit Gupta, Anjali Agrawal, Marla Sammer, Akshay Kumar Saxena

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amit GuptaDepartment of Pediatric and Onco-Radiology, AIIMS, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Anjali AgrawalTeleradiology Solutions, 12 B Sriram Road, Civil Lines, Delhi, 110054, India. anjali.agrawal@telradsol.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6725-7500
Marla SammerTexas Children's Department of Radiology, AI & Innovation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Akshay Kumar SaxenaDepartment of Radio Diagnosis and Imaging, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector-12, Chandigarh, 160012, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping healthcare, and radiology is at the forefront for adoption. Increasing demand for imaging, complex protocols, quantitative image analysis, and workforce shortages drive AI development. However, clinical translation in pediatric imaging still lags its use in general radiology. Only a small number of approved tools carry explicit pediatric indications, and these focus on narrow tasks. In chest imaging, deep learning models can detect pneumonia, tuberculosis, and misplaced lines or tubes, though performance depends on pediatric-specific training and local validation. Automated bone age assessment is among the earliest and most widely adopted applications. Neuroimaging benefits include reduced acquisition times, lower contrast doses, and rapid triage of critical findings. Cardiovascular applications support congenital heart disease detection and functional assessment, while oncology applications are being explored for tumor characterization and segmentation for therapy planning. Beyond interpretation, AI can enhance workflow triage, structured reporting, and patient communication. Despite these advances, barriers remain for AI adoption. These include scarcity of pediatric datasets, limited prospective validation, workflow integration challenges, interpretability concerns, and complex ethical and legal issues unique to children. Integration with hospital systems is uneven, and routine monitoring and support are often missing. Pediatricians and surgeons should work with radiologists and data scientists to define use cases, curate datasets, validate performance, and set ethical guardrails. Future progress will depend on collaborative data sharing, robust validation, clinician engagement, child-centred guidelines, and human-centred design to ensure safe, equitable, and meaningful adoption.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDiagnostic ImagingPediatricsChildHumansArtificial intelligenceClinical decision supportData sharingPediatric AIPediatric imaging

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.