ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
Managing Communication Challenges in Mental Health Care by Using Mobile Translation Apps: Protocol for a Simulation-Based Pilot Study.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLanguage barriers in mental health care can hinder diagnostic accuracy, communication quality, and therapeutic rapport. Multilingual mental health care providers (MHCPs) or qualified interpreters are not always available, prompting interest in mobile translation apps as alternative tools. The usability of such tools in mental health consultations remains underexplored.
objectiveThis pilot study aims to assess whether a mobile machine translation app can support MHCPs in conducting accurate mental health assessments with patients who speak a different language. Secondary objectives include assessing usability, communication quality, translation accuracy, and nonverbal interaction in a simulated mental health care setting. The feasibility objectives are to examine recruitment, retention, data completeness, time adherence, acceptability, scenario realism, and resource requirements to inform the design of a larger future trial.
methodsThis is a single-arm, simulation-based, mixed methods pilot study involving 12 German-speaking MHCPs and 2 Turkish-speaking standardized service users. In this study, MHCPs include both fully trained professionals and individuals in advanced training involved in mental health care delivery. Each health care provider will participate in a simulated mental health consultation lasting up to 30 minutes, using the mobile translation app Mabel, which provides real-time translation during multilingual clinical interactions. Data will be collected via video and audio recordings, app use metrics, postsimulation questionnaires, and optional qualitative interviews. Data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics, thematic analysis, and mixed methods triangulation.
resultsAs of March 2026, no participants have been enrolled. The pilot study is being conducted within an ongoing Volkswagen Foundation-funded research project. Preparatory work, including scenario development, scoring rubrics, and data collection materials, is at an advanced stage. Recruitment is scheduled to begin in May 2026, with data collection completion anticipated in July 2026. Results will be reported in a future publication.
conclusionsThis pilot study will provide initial evidence on the usability and feasibility of mobile translation apps in mental health care and inform the design of a larger implementation study.
trial registrationOSF Registries osf.io/7r2hn; https://osf.io/7r2hn. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/86787.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.