ArticleInternational dental journal2026
The Impact of Dental Prostheses in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: A Scoping Review With Exploratory Analysis.
Article in International dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dental prostheses not only restore oral function but may also impact systemic health outcomes. This scoping review sought to synthesize evidence on the association between dental prostheses, hypertension, and physical function, including frailty, in adults with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) or elevated cardiovascular risk. This review was conducted following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Literature searches were performed in PubMed and Google Scholar up to November 10, 2024. Eligible studies were observational investigations involving adults with established CVD or elevated cardiovascular risk who used dental prostheses. An exploratory quantitative approach was used to summarize the direction and patterns of association. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria: 5 assessed hypertension and 2 examined physical function. Exploratory pooled analysis based on unadjusted data indicated that individuals with dental prostheses had a lower odds of hypertension (odds ratio = 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.91), although substantial heterogeneity (I² = 95%) and the use of unadjusted estimates imply a high risk of residual confounding. Limited evidence suggests that dental prosthesis use may help preserve mobility and mitigate frailty in patients with CVD; however, differences in frailty definitions and limited adjustment for confounding factors reduce comparability and indicate that these findings should be interpreted as exploratory and hypothesis-generating. Current evidence suggests that dental prosthesis use may offer benefits beyond oral rehabilitation, potentially linked to better hypertension-related outcomes and physical function in adults with CVD or elevated cardiovascular risk, but certainty is limited by the small number of studies and methodological heterogeneity. These exploratory, hypothesis-generating findings highlight the need for well-designed longitudinal studies to clarify potential associations and underlying mechanisms. Beyond restoring oral function, prosthodontic rehabilitation may have broader systemic implications, contributing to better cardiovascular-related outcomes in aging populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.