ArticleNature communications2026
Scalable, fast and accurate differential gene expression testing from millions of cells of multiple patients.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scalable, fast and accurate differential gene expression testing from millions of cells of multiple patients.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Spatial transcriptomic-metabolic features of tumor foci and tumor capsule in microvascular invasion with hepatocellular carcinoma: A spatial multi-omics study.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since the development of DNA microarrays and later RNA bulk sequencing, testing with statistically independent samples has been the standard method for detecting genes with different transcription patterns. Single-cell assays challenge these assumptions because individual cells are statistically dependent, and all proposed methodologies present mathematical limitations or computational bottlenecks that prevent a seamless integration of data from many cells and patients simultaneously. In this work, we solve this crucial limitation by introducing a Bayesian framework that retrieves the independence structure at the level of individual patients, separating differences across individuals from actual transcriptional differences. Leveraging multi-GPU and variational inference, our approach excels across different experimental designs and scales to analyse over 10 million cells. This framework enables single-cell differential expression analysis that can finally integrate datasets from large clinical cohorts, atlas projects, or drug-response screens with thousands of samples and millions of cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.