ArticleScientific reports2026
Prevalence and risk factors associated with diabetic retinopathy: a cross-sectional study in northern Xinjiang.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess the prevalence and risk factors of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in northern Xinjiang. A hospital-based cross-sectional study was performed on patients above 20 years old who were enrolled in chronic diabetes management in six areas of northern Xinjiang. All subjects received a standardized questionnaire interview of baseline characteristics. Fundus photographs were captured and reviewed by optometrists and ophthalmologists using DR grading software to determine the diagnosis and severity of DR according to the UK guidelines. A total of 3253 patients with diabetes were surveyed, among whom 2972 subjects with graded fundus photographs. The age-standardized prevalence of DR was 17.9% and vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR) was 8.7%. In the binary logistic regression model, younger age, male gender, longer duration of diabetes, higher fasting blood glucose, hypertension, and treatment methods (insulin use compared to diet only) were independent risk factors for DR. These risk factors were associated with VTDR except the male gender. The prevalence of DR and VTDR in diabetic patients in northern Xinjiang was 17.9% and 8.7%, respectively. The younger age, male gender, higher fasting blood glucose, hypertension, and insulin use were the main risk factors for DR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.