Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42321398›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Life-cycle sustainability assessment of public general hospital buildings in China.

Kaiyue Huang, Wenjuan Zhang, Xinyue Miao, Tongyu Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kaiyue HuangDepartment of Hospital Construction, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310000, China.
Wenjuan ZhangDepartment of Information Technology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310000, China. zwj423@ZJU.edu.cn.
Xinyue MiaoCollege of Urban Construction, Changchun University of Architecture, Changchun, 130000, China.
Tongyu XuThe Architectural Design and Research Institute of Zhejiang University Co., Ltd, Hangzhou, 310027, China. xutongyu0409@outlook.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under the backdrop of China's "dual carbon" goals and the high-quality development of healthcare, general hospitals-characterized by high energy consumption and emissions-require systematic and quantitative evaluation to support sustainable transformation. Based on the Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) framework, this study develops a comprehensive evaluation model integrating Environmental Life Cycle Assessment (ELCA), Life Cycle Cost (LCC), and Social Life Cycle Assessment (SLCA). Using "per bed" as the functional unit, an empirical analysis was conducted on 16 public general hospitals across four representative climate zones in China. Through multi-source data collection, questionnaire surveys, and expert weighting, indicators including carbon emissions during construction and operation, lifecycle cost, and patient satisfaction were standardized and integrated into a comparable LCSA index. The results suggest that: (1) climate zone was associated with differences in CO₂e-based environmental performance, with higher per-bed carbon emissions observed in colder regions; (2) operation and maintenance account for 55-60% of total life-cycle cost, and intelligent energy management combined with renewable energy can simultaneously reduce LCC and ELCA; and (3) social performance is generally moderate, with building comfort, spatial organization, and doctor-patient interaction identified as key determinants of patient satisfaction. Significant differences in sustainability performance were observed among cases, with newly built or green-renovated hospitals equipped with intelligent management systems performing better. The findings highlight that LCSA reflects the coupling relationships among environmental, economic, and social dimensions, where improvements in one dimension may generate synergies or trade-offs with others. The proposed framework provides a quantitative and stakeholder-oriented decision-support basis for hospital administrators, architects, and policymakers to promote low-carbon, cost-effective, and human-centered hospital building transformation.

Indexed as

Hospitals, GeneralHospitals, PublicChinaHumansSustainable DevelopmentEnvironmental performanceLife-cycle costLife-cycle sustainability assessmentPatient satisfactionPublic hospital buildings

Identifiers

PMID42321398
PMCPMC13550540

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.