ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
When Does Rectus Diastasis Worsen the Most? A Pregnancy-Order Analysis of Midline Fascial Failure.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstaract
backgroundDiastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles (DRA) is common after pregnancy, yet little is known about its sequential progression across multiple gestations. While multiparity is a recognized risk factor for greater diastasis severity, it remains unclear whether midline widening increases linearly with each pregnancy or follows a nonlinear biomechanical pattern with specific points of maximal fascial failure.
objectivesTo evaluate how maximal inter-rectus distance (IRDmax) changes after each pregnancy in women who have completed childbearing, and to determine whether distinct worsening patterns can be identified.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on 117 postpartum women seeking abdominal wall reconstruction. Radiologic measurements of IRDmax (ultrasound, CT, or MRI) obtained after each pregnancy were collected and parity-matched. The primary endpoint was the within-patient sequential change in IRDmax across gestations. Polynomial and segmented regression models were used to detect inflection points, nonlinear trajectories, and plateau behavior.
resultsThe greatest mean increase in IRDmax occurred between the first and second pregnancies ( + 1.9 cm; +59.4%), representing the primary inflection point in 88.1% of patients. Subsequent pregnancies showed significantly smaller widening increments (0.4-0.7 cm), indicating a relative post-second-pregnancy plateau. A minority (22.2%) demonstrated late or progressive worsening beyond the third pregnancy, associated with higher mechanical load factors such as twin gestations, elevated fetal birth weight, and excessive maternal gestational weight gain-suggesting inter-individual variability in collagen quality and abdominal wall compliance.
conclusionsDRA progression does not follow a linear cumulative model. For most women, the second pregnancy represents the major biomechanical stress event responsible for the greatest fascial deterioration, after which midline widening tends to stabilize. However, patients exposed to high intra-abdominal pressure loads may continue to worsen in later pregnancies. Recognition of these trajectory patterns is valuable for surgical counseling, timing of abdominal wall repair, and risk assessment for recurrence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42321447What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.