ArticleBMC surgery2026
Predictive value of the preoperative controlling nutritional status score for anastomotic leakage after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer and risk stratification based on predicted probability.
Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnastomotic leakage remains one of the major complications after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer and may increase postoperative morbidity and delay recovery. Preoperative nutritional status is closely associated with anastomotic healing; however, the value of the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score for predicting clinically relevant anastomotic leakage after gastric cancer surgery requires further clarification. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the preoperative CONUT score for clinically relevant anastomotic leakage after radical gastrectomy and to construct an interpretable risk prediction model and a three-tier risk stratification system based on predicted probability.
methodsClinical data from 283 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy from January 2021 to January 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. The CONUT score was calculated from serum albumin, total lymphocyte count, and total cholesterol. The primary endpoint was clinically relevant anastomotic leakage of grade II or higher within 30 postoperative days. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive value of the CONUT score and its components. Internal validation was performed using bootstrap resampling with 1000 repetitions, and exploratory temporal validation was conducted by using patients treated from January 2021 to December 2023 as the modeling cohort and those treated from January 2024 to January 2025 as the temporal validation cohort.
resultsAmong the 283 patients, 39 (13.8%) developed clinically relevant anastomotic leakage. Multivariable Logistic regression showed that CONUT score (odds ratio [OR] = 1.425, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.168-1.739, P < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.486, 95% CI: 1.052-5.876, P = 0.038), total gastrectomy (OR = 2.318, 95% CI: 1.028-5.228, P = 0.043), operative time (OR = 1.008, 95% CI: 1.002-1.014, P = 0.012), and intraoperative blood loss (OR = 1.004, 95% CI: 1.001-1.007, P = 0.018) were independent risk factors for anastomotic leakage. The area under the curve (AUC) of the CONUT score for predicting anastomotic leakage was 0.782 (95% CI: 0.716-0.848). When a CONUT score ≥ 3 was used as a sensitivity-prioritized screening threshold, the sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value were 74.4%, 62.3%, and 93.8%, respectively; when a score ≥ 4 was used as a higher-specificity alternative threshold, the sensitivity and specificity were 59.0% and 78.3%, respectively. Compared with serum albumin alone, the AUC of the CONUT score showed a modest increase of 0.058 (DeLong test P = 0.042). The risk prediction model based on five independent risk factors had an apparent concordance index (C-index) of 0.838 (95% CI: 0.779-0.897), a bootstrap-corrected C-index of 0.826, and a C-index of 0.803 (95% CI: 0.701-0.905) in the temporal validation cohort. After three-tier risk stratification based on predicted probability, the incidence of anastomotic leakage increased stepwise in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups (χ² = 56.925, P < 0.001).
conclusionsThe preoperative CONUT score was associated with an increased risk of clinically relevant anastomotic leakage after gastric cancer surgery. A risk prediction model incorporating CONUT score, diabetes mellitus, total gastrectomy, operative time, and intraoperative blood loss may provide a reference for perioperative risk assessment, although multicenter external validation is still required before broader application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.