Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42321778›Full record

ArticleAnnals of general psychiatry2026

Examining clinical relevance of interpretation inflexibility in social contexts.

Wisteria Deng, Reut Zabag, Saumya Narain, Tyrone D Cannon, Jutta Joormann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of general psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wisteria DengDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, 100 College Street, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA. wisteria.deng@yale.edu.
Reut ZabagDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, 100 College Street, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Saumya NarainDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, 100 College Street, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Tyrone D CannonDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, 100 College Street, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Jutta JoormannDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, 100 College Street, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing research highlights interpretation inflexibility as a key transdiagnostic mechanism across psychopathologies. Yet, few studies have examined its role in everyday socio-emotional processing. This review bridges that gap by exploring how interpretation inflexibility contributes to psychopathology-particularly depression and psychosis-in social contexts. Evidence suggests disrupted interpersonal processes, including rigid interpretations of social scenarios and impressions of others, are central to understanding depressive and psychotic symptoms. Depression is marked by valence-specific, context-dependent inflexibility, with difficulty disengaging from negative biases. In contrast, psychosis shows a broader inflexibility across emotional valences. The review also outlines evolving measures of interpretation inflexibility, emphasizing the need to account for social context in interpretation revision. Current findings highlight the value of examining inflexibility within social frameworks to better understand its role in adaptive functioning and psychopathology. Future research on interpretation inflexibility in social contexts could inform novel interventions and improve clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Belief RevisionBiasDepressionInterpretation InflexibilityPsychosisSocial Processing

Identifiers

PMID42321778
PMCPMC13531911

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.