ReviewMolecular neurobiology2026
LPS-Induced Neuroinflammation in Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Double-Edged Sword?
Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a glycolipid endotoxin derived from Gram-negative bacteria, activates Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling in microglia and astrocytes, initiating neuroimmune cascades characterized by pro-inflammatory cytokine release, oxidative stress, and glial reactivity. Chronic or high-dose LPS exposure promotes sustained neuroinflammation, blood-brain barrier disruption, impaired amyloid-β (Aβ) clearance in Alzheimer's disease (AD), and exacerbated α-synuclein pathology in Parkinson's disease (PD). In contrast, low-dose or intermittent exposure may promote adaptive neuroimmune responses characterized by regulated glial signaling and enhanced neuronal resilience. Emerging evidence suggests that these divergent outcomes are shaped by the biological context of LPS exposure, including dose, duration, route of administration, and host inflammatory status. The gut-brain axis further modulates these effects by linking peripheral inflammatory signals and microbial metabolites to central nervous system responses. Despite growing mechanistic insight, important knowledge gaps remain, particularly regarding the translational relevance of region-specific glial responses in humans. Improved understanding of context-dependent LPS signaling may help explain inconsistencies across experimental studies, refine neuroinflammation models, and support the development of therapeutic strategies targeting TLR4 signaling, autophagy, and gut-brain interactions. Collectively, current evidence suggests that LPS-induced neuroinflammation exists along a dynamic continuum, with transient immune activation potentially supporting adaptive neuroimmune responses, whereas chronic or dysregulated exposure promotes sustained neuroinflammation and progressive neurodegenerative changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42322379What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.