Evidence mapPaperPMID 42322439Full record

ReviewJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2026

Bacterial nanocellulose: biosynthesis, structural properties and vascular tissue engineering applications.

Saeed Sharifpoor Kermani, Jens Wippermann, Priya Veluswamy, Max Wacker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saeed Sharifpoor KermaniDepartment of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Jens WippermannDepartment of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Priya VeluswamyDepartment of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Max WackerDepartment of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany. max.wacker@med.ovgu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0664-2613

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) via autologous vein or artery is still the gold standard surgery operative revascularization. However autologous vein/artery may represent some limitations like varicose veins or unavailability of veins due to reoperations especially in older patients. consequently, the research focus directed towards identification and characterization of biocompatible alternative material. Bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) as a natural material has gained substantial recognition in the research field of tissue engineering due to it exceptional attributes, including biocompatibility, enhanced mechanical properties, non-toxicity and unique physicochemical properties. Nevertheless, BNC is associated with some restrictions in endothelial cell adhesion and mimicking the physiochemical and mechanical properties of autologous vein as a promising alternative. To address these challenges, future research must focus on the development of BNC with controlled surface and mechanical characteristic. This review aims to address diverse aspect of controlling BNC production and methodologies in order to optimize the mechanical and physiochemical properties of grafts as an alternative in cardiovascular tissue engineering. Created with BioRender.com.

Indexed as

BacteriaBlood Vessel ProsthesisCelluloseNanostructuresTissue EngineeringAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsHumansTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsCellulose

Identifiers

PMID42322439
PMCPMC13283160

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.