Evidence mapPaperPMID 42322456Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2026

Multimodal evaluation of 525 nm laser-induced retinal injury in rabbits: structural, functional and cytokine analyses.

Ling Guo, Kuijun Chen, Guanhua Li, Jian Zeng, Zhuangqing Fan, Congyi Li, Yangcheng Zou, Jie Xu, Jieyuan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ling GuoDepartment of Weapon Bioeffect Assessment, Research Institute of Surgery, Daping Hospital,, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Kuijun ChenDepartment of Weapon Bioeffect Assessment, Research Institute of Surgery, Daping Hospital,, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Guanhua LiDepartment of Weapon Bioeffect Assessment, Research Institute of Surgery, Daping Hospital,, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jian ZengDepartment of Weapon Bioeffect Assessment, Research Institute of Surgery, Daping Hospital,, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zhuangqing FanDepartment of Weapon Bioeffect Assessment, Research Institute of Surgery, Daping Hospital,, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Congyi LiDepartment of Weapon Bioeffect Assessment, Research Institute of Surgery, Daping Hospital,, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yangcheng ZouDepartment of Weapon Bioeffect Assessment, Research Institute of Surgery, Daping Hospital,, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jie XuDepartment of Weapon Bioeffect Assessment, Research Institute of Surgery, Daping Hospital,, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jieyuan ZhangDepartment of Weapon Bioeffect Assessment, Research Institute of Surgery, Daping Hospital,, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China. zhangjieyuan@tmmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to systematically study the characterize of retinal damage induced by 525 nm laser irradiation at different power densities through multimodal assessment methods, including structural, functional and cytokine analyses. A total of 24 rabbits were exposed to laser irradiation at 0.5, 200, 500, and 1000 mW/cm

Indexed as

CytokinesRetinaAnimalsAqueous HumorElectroretinographyRabbitsRetinal DetachmentTomography, Optical CoherenceCytokinesElectroretinographyLaser exposureOptical coherence tomographyProtein microarrayRetinal injury

Identifiers

PMID42322456
PMCPMC13283195

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.