ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Telesurgery and remote surgery research: a bibliometric analysis of scientific growth, collaboration, and thematic evolution.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telesurgery and remote surgery have gained relevance in surgical innovation due to advances in robotics, telepresence, artificial intelligence, and high-speed communication networks. Despite this progress, the global evolution, collaborative structure, and thematic development of this field remain insufficiently characterized. A bibliometric study was conducted using records retrieved from Web of Science. Publications on telesurgery and remote surgery published up to 2025 were included. Bibliographic data were processed and analyzed using the bibliometrix package in R. Bibliometric indicators, citation metrics, country productivity, journal output, author contributions, collaboration networks, and keyword-based thematic patterns were assessed. A total of 476 publications on telesurgery were included, distributed across 290 journals. Scientific production showed sustained growth, with an annual growth rate of 20.59%, a mean document age of 6.06 years, and peak output in 2024. The average citation count was 28.54 citations per document. The United States and China were the leading contributors, with 151 and 120 publications, respectively, and also acted as the main hubs in the international collaboration network. The most cited studies focused on telerobotic systems for minimally invasive surgery, telerobotic neurovascular interventions, and ultra-reliable low-latency communications. Keyword analysis showed a progressive shift from early clinical feasibility and surgical applications toward connectivity, latency, robotic systems, extended reality, blockchain, and artificial intelligence. These trends indicate the transition of telesurgery from a clinically exploratory field to a technology-driven research domain. Telesurgery and remote surgery constitute a rapidly expanding and technologically driven research field. Future progress will require stronger international collaboration, real-world clinical validation, standardized outcome assessment, and strategies to reduce technological inequities across regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42322475What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.