ArticleVeterinary research communications2026
Inhabiting the host: ectoparasites and Vector-Borne pathogens in Phyllostomidae bats within urban forest fragments.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While bats are known to harbor various viruses and bacteria, their role as hosts for hemoparasites has not been extensively studied. This research investigated the presence of ectoparasites and vector-borne pathogens-including Anaplasmataceae agents, hemoplasmas, apicomplexans, and kinetoplastids-in 74 Phyllostomidae bats sampled from an urban forest fragment in southeastern Brazil. Overall, 31.1% of the bats were infested with ectoparasites: 82.6% carried only Streblidae bat flies, 13.0% had only mites, and 4.4% were co-infested with both parasites. No hemoparasites were observed in Giemsa-stained preparations. Furthermore, all samples tested negative for PCR assays targeting the orders Haemosporida and Piroplasmida, as well as for Anaplasma sp., Neorickettsia sp., Trypanosoma cruzi, and Trypanosoma evansi. Molecular analyses revealed that 1.4% of the bats were positive for Ehrlichia sp., 20.3% for hemotropic Mycoplasma spp., and 1.4% for Leishmania infantum. Coinfections were found in 1.4% of the positive samples. Sequence analyses revealed that the detected Ehrlichia sp. is closely related to Ehrlichia canis, and that the Mycoplasma sp. shares high sequence identity with bat-associated hemoplasmas. These findings document the presence of ectoparasites and hemopathogens in the sampled Phyllostomidae bats, indicating that these infectious agents circulate within urban forest fragments. While the specific role of these bats in sustaining the pathogens' life cycles remains to be fully elucidated, these initial findings underscore the need for expanded eco-epidemiological studies. This highlights the crucial need to study these pathogens in bat populations, underscoring their ecological significance and the potential implications for public health and biodiversity conservation (e.g. zoonotic spillover and population stress).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.