Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42322662›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, epidemiology and genomics2026

Risk Factors Associated With Major Skin Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Study From Bangladesh.

Md Abrar Ashfaq Khan, Md Rashed Babu, Mohammad Ohid Ullah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, epidemiology and genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Md Abrar Ashfaq KhanDepartment of Data Science and Statistics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA, oregon.gov.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5372-8420
Md Rashed BabuDepartment of Statistics, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet, Bangladesh, sust.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6133-7995
Mohammad Ohid UllahDepartment of Statistics, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet, Bangladesh, sust.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2336-3018

Funding

Shahjalal University of Science and TechnologySUST Research Center PS/2022/2/34
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkin diseases are prevalent in Bangladesh, affecting individuals across all age groups and significantly impacting both personal and community health.

objectiveThis study aims to identify risk factors associated with certain skin diseases in Bangladesh, specifically examining lifestyle, environmental, food-related, and heritable factors. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study was conducted across three major divisions in Bangladesh (Dhaka, Rangpur, and Chattogram) from December 2022 to July 2023. Data were collected from 788 respondents using a structured questionnaire through a purposive quota sampling technique. The questionnaire covered self-reported skin disease status, sociodemographic characteristics, and potential risk factors. The analysis employed univariate tools, principal component analysis (PCA) to reduce correlated risk factors into uncorrelated components, and principal component logistic regression (PCLR) to assess associations. Goodness-of-fit testing was conducted to validate model calibration, and sensitivity analyses adjusting for sociodemographic confounders were performed to confirm the robustness of identified associations.

resultsAmong the 788 respondents, 61.80% (n = 487) reported skin diseases. Among these, atopic dermatitis was the most prevalent condition (72.07%), followed by fungal infection (26.90%), acne vulgaris (20.74%), seborrheic dermatitis (13.55%), and psoriasis (8.21%); as multiple conditions could be reported concurrently, these percentages are not mutually exclusive. Through PCA and PCLR analyses, several associations were initially identified. Following rigorous goodness-of-fit testing, two associations demonstrated adequate model calibration: heritable factors were significantly associated with fungal infection, and environmental factors were significantly associated with acne vulgaris. A one-unit increase in heritable factors (for instance, having an additional family member with skin disease) increased the odds of fungal infection by 34% in unadjusted models (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.08-1.66), and a one-unit increase in environmental factors increased the odds of acne vulgaris by 45% in unadjusted models (OR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.16-1.80). After adjusting for age, sex, division, and disease-specific confounders, these associations remained significant (adjusted OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.09-1.74 for fungal infection; adjusted OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.05-1.67 for acne vulgaris), confirming their robustness.

conclusionThis study provides valuable insights into risk factors associated with skin diseases in Bangladesh. The findings highlight that family history plays a significant role in fungal infection susceptibility, while environmental exposures are important determinants of acne vulgaris. The study underscores the importance of rigorous goodness-of-fit testing and confounder adjustment in observational research, as several initially significant associations did not demonstrate adequate model calibration or lost significance after adjustment. These validated findings suggest the need for targeted interventions addressing heritable predisposition for fungal infections and environmental mitigation strategies for acne vulgaris in Bangladesh.

Indexed as

Skin DiseasesAdolescentAdultBangladeshCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultacne vulgarisBangladeshenvironmental factorsfungal infectionheritable factorsprincipal component analysisskin disease

Identifiers

PMID42322662
PMCPMC13283032

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.