Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42322752›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2026

Learning how to experience the world: From circuits to cell types to genes.

Jerry L Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jerry L ChenDepartment of Biology, Boston University, Boston MA, 02215, USA; Center for Neurophotonics, Boston University, Boston MA, 02215, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston MA, 02215, USA; Center for Systems Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston MA, 02215, USA. Electronic address: jerry@chen-lab.org.

Funding

Bridging Function, Connectivity, and Transcriptomics of Mouse Cortical NeuronsU01MH130907 · NIMH · ALLEN INSTITUTE · PI ANTON ARKHIPOV, MARINA E. GARRETT · 2022 to 2026
$12.5M
Local and Long-Range Cortical Circuits Underlying Tactile PerceptionR01NS140230 · NINDS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI Jerry L Chen · 2025 to 2026
$1.1M
Functional and Molecular Dissection of Marmoset Face AreasR21EY037066 · NEI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI CHEN, JERRY L, FREIWALD, WINRICH · 2025 to 2025
$474k
Molecular Cellular and Circuit Level Mechanisms of Working Memory MaintenanceR21MH140102 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI Jerry L Chen · 2026 to 2026
$450k
NEI NIH HHS R21 EY037066NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH140102NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH130907NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS140230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perception depends on the brain's ability to transform high-dimensional sensory inputs into low-dimensional internal models that support adaptive behavior. Evidence supports two frameworks for sensory perception-representational processing, in which stimulus features are progressively integrated into complex perceptual objects across a cortical hierarchy, and predictive processing, in which internally generated predictions are continuously reconciled with incoming sensory signals. Yet how these frameworks are mechanistically implemented in neural circuits, and whether they can be unified, remains an open question. Here, we review recent studies in mouse primary sensory and higher-order association cortex demonstrating that cell-type-specific transcriptional programs may provide a critical mechanistic link between these frameworks and circuit functions. In primary sensory cortices, neurons that function as stable feature detectors or respond to sensory prediction errors correspond to distinct molecularly defined cell types. In higher-order association cortices, distinct inhibitory cell-type compositions and plasticity-related gene expression support both associative learning for representational processing and error learning for predictive processing. We discuss how cell-type-specific transcriptional programs may endow cell types and circuits with the capacity to support both representational and predictive processing modes in a behavioral state-dependent manner. This could potentially enable active sensation during behavioral engagement as well as memory consolidation and model updating during behavioral quiescence. Together, these studies suggest that examining how gene expression programs equip specific cell types with relevant computational properties is a promising approach that can integrate these frameworks and provide a new understanding of how sensory perception is implemented in the brain.

Indexed as

LearningNerve NetNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID42322752
PMCPMC13381056

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.