ArticleCJEM2026
Electrocardiogram competency of Canadian emergency medicine residents: curriculum gaps and opportunities for improvement.
Article in CJEM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveElectrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation is crucial for emergencies, alongside point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS). A prior survey of Emergency Medicine program directors identified "must know" ECG diagnoses. But whether ECG interpretation is adequately promoted by the Royal College, included in structured curriculum, and learned by residents is unknown. We sought to identify curriculum gaps and opportunities for improvement.
methodsUsing constructive alignment framework, we conducted a multi-modal evaluation of Canadian Emergency Medicine residency program ECG education. For intended learning outcomes, we reviewed the college's Entrustable Professional Activities, comparing ECG with PoCUS. For teaching and learning activities, we administered a national cross-sectional survey of program directors. For assessment, we surveyed residents on self-reported efficacy in interpreting "must know" ECG diagnoses.
resultsThere is no Royal College Entrustable Professional Activities for ECGs, and only 1 milestone compared with 9 for PoCUS. A majority (60%) of program directors reported no structured ECG curriculum, and most (57.4%) residents reported < 1 h of ECG self-study per month. There were 60% of program directors and 92% of residents who agreed they would benefit from structured teaching. Self-reported efficacy increased through residency, from 60% for PGY-2 to 90% for PGY-5. But there were gaps with low efficacy (e.g., for bifascicular block, failure to capture, Brugada pattern, and myocardial infarction in the presence of bundle branch block). PGY-5 residents reported autonomy for ventricular tachycardia, hyperkalemia, and acute myocardial infarction, despite known limitations from the literature of Emergency physicians.
conclusionECG curriculum gaps include lower emphasis from Royal College Entrustable Professional Activities compared with PoCUS, limited structured ECG curriculum, and little self-study. While self-reported efficacy increases through residency, there are perceived gaps for many "must know" diagnoses, and unperceived gaps with confidence that exceeds known practice variation. The majority of survey responses agree they would benefit from structured training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42323520What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.