ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Strong phylogenetic signal from chloroplast genomes of three Barringtonia species provides the first genomic resources for their conservation.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe genus Barringtonia (Lecythidaceae) is a vital component of tropical coastal forests and mangrove ecosystems. Among its members, B. racemosa and B. fusicarpa are classified as Endangered and Vulnerable, respectively, due to habitat degradation and anthropogenic pressures, underscoring the urgent need for genetic studies to guide conservation. Chloroplast (cp.) genomes serve as essential resources for phylogenetic reconstruction and conservation genetics. However, the scarcity of cp. genome data for Barringtonia has limited comprehensive evolutionary and conservation-oriented investigations.
resultsWe assembled and annotated the first complete cp. genomes of B. racemosa, B. fusicarpa, and B. acutangula. All three genomes exhibit the typical quadripartite structure, ranging from 158,959 bp (B. racemosa) to 159,837 bp (B. acutangula), and contain 132 genes (87 protein-coding, 37 tRNA, 8 rRNA) with a GC content of 36.68%-36.86%. Collinearity and IR boundary analyses revealed high structural conservation without large-scale rearrangements. Interspecific sequence-level variations were detected in simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and long repeats. Nucleotide diversity (π) analysis identified highly polymorphic regions, including rpl20 (π = 0.080), rpoA (π = 0.064), rps3 (π = 0.063), and ndhF (π = 0.060), which represent promising molecular markers for population genetics within the genus. Codon-based selection analyses (Ka/Ks) showed that all protein-coding genes are under strong purifying selection (mean Ka/Ks 0.32-0.37), with no evidence of positive selection. Pairwise genetic distances (p-distances) among Barringtonia species are extremely low (mean 0.0046), while distances to the related genus Bertholletia are ~ 6-fold higher, supporting their generic distinction.
conclusionsPhylogenetic analysis robustly supports Barringtonia as a monophyletic clade (bootstrap = 100%), with B. racemosa and B. fusicarpa forming a sister lineage to B. acutangula. This study provides the first high-quality cp. genome resources for the two threatened Barringtonia species, revealing strong structural and sequence conservation but no direct chloroplast genomic correlates of endangerment. The identified polymorphic regions and repeat markers lay a foundation for future population genetics, phylogeographic studies, and conservation-oriented genetic management of these ecologically important coastal plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.