ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Application of gamified interventions in children with type 1 diabetes: a scoping review.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundType 1 diabetes poses substantial self-management challenges for children. Gamified interventions are a promising strategy to support this population, yet evidence on their design, implementation, and reported outcomes remains scattered. This scoping review aims to systematically map the international evidence on gamified interventions for children with T1DM, focusing on their characteristics, delivery, and outcomes.
methodsFollowing the Arksey and O'Malley framework, this scoping review systematically searched six databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science) from January 1, 2010, to January 25, 2026. We also examined reference lists and performed citation tracking.
resultsTwenty-three of 762 retrieved articles were included. Interventions were primarily delivered via mobile applications (52%) and websites (17%). The most common gamification elements were goal setting, challenges, and fun (each 96%); social features were less frequent (35%). Most studies (70%) lacked an explicit theoretical framework, and intervention durations varied widely. The interventions demonstrated benefits for glycemic control, self-management, knowledge, and psychological distress, but inconsistent effects on quality of life. They were generally feasible, usable, and acceptable.
conclusionGamified interventions represent a promising approach to T1DM management in children, aligning well with their developmental needs. However, current studies often lack a theoretical foundation and evidence of sustained benefits. Future work should prioritize theory-driven design and rigorous long-term evaluation. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: This review protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) and accessible via the following link: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MN6AE .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.