ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2026
Empowering community pharmacists: expert consensus guidance for the effective management of peripheral neuropathy with neurotropic B vitamins.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPeripheral neuropathy (PN) is a prevalent condition in the Asia-Pacific region with a significant proportion of undiagnosed cases. Despite heterogeneous pharmacy practices across the region, clinical and operational challenges remain consistent. Community pharmacists are well-positioned to overcome these challenges but lack specific guidance for managing PN in the pharmacy setting.
aimThis study aimed to develop expert consensus recommendations for community pharmacists on the early screening, assessment and management of PN.
methodA modified two-round Delphi process was adopted, involving a panel of seven pharmacists from across the region. The process included a targeted literature review, yielding a total of 41 articles, two rounds of anonymous survey, and a virtual expert round table discussion (ERTD) with the panel of pharmacists to achieve consensus.
resultsThe Delphi process yielded six consensus statements, covering the burden of PN, role of community pharmacists, early screening of patients at risk of PN, assessment and evaluation of PN patients, and guidance on management approaches of PN with neurotropic B vitamins.
conclusionThese consensus statements offer practical guidance for community pharmacists to improve the early detection and management of PN in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region, potentially enhancing patient outcomes and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.