ArticleJournal of translational medicine2026
Tackling non-canonical splicing in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy to reduce the uncertain significance variants burden.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSplice-altering variants (SAVs), particularly those outside canonical splice sites, are an underappreciated contributor to inherited cardiovascular diseases. In arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM), these variants frequently remain classified as of uncertain significance (VUS) due to limited predictive power and lack of transcript-level evidence, constraining genetic yield and clinical management. Our study aimed to determine the functional impact of SAVs in ACM genes and refine their classification using ACMG/AMP and ClinGen SVI criteria.
methodsSAVs identified in 200 ACM probands underwent SpliceAI prediction, GTEx cardiac exon-usage annotation, and functional assessment using pSPL3-based minigene assays. Aberrant transcripts were quantified using Percent Splicing Alteration (PSA). Segregation data and ACMG/AMP criteria refined by ClinGen SVI were applied to integrate functional and clinical evidence for classification.
resultsAberrant splicing was confirmed in 9/20 variants (45%), including synonymous, missense, and non-canonical intronic changes. SpliceAI scores correlated strongly with PSA values (R²=0.86). Case-control burden testing revealed significant enrichment of splice-altering variants in DSP, DSG2, DSC2 and FLNC. Integrating predictive algorithms with experimental validation and segregation analysis markedly enhances reclassification of 16/20 variants (80%).
conclusionSplicing defects beyond canonical sites significantly shape ACM genetic landscape. Integrating predictive models with experimental validation clarifies uncertain variants bridging the gap between genomic uncertainty and clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.