ArticleWorld journal of urology2026
Finding a solution: preliminary results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes under saline-restricted irrigation conditions.
Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn September 2024, flooding from Hurricane Helene shut down a Baxter Solutions facility, which produced ~ 60% of the United States' intravenous fluids, resulting in a nationwide saline shortage. Hospitals subsequently restricted perioperative irrigation, including in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), which traditionally relies on continuous saline irrigation throughout the procedure. We compared outcomes of PCNL under saline-restricted conditions with matched cases performed before the shortage.
methodsBetween October 15 and November 4, 2024, ten PCNLs were performed with recommendations to minimize irrigation. A matched control group was selected from a prospective institutional PCNL database, matched by age, sex, stone size, and operative time. Perioperative and postoperative outcomes-including irrigation volume, stone-free rate, laboratory values, and hospital length of stay-were analyzed using t-tests, Pearson chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests.
resultsMean irrigation volume was significantly lower in the saline-restricted group compared with controls (6,600 ± 4,852 mL vs. 19,125 ± 18,195 mL, p = 0.009). There were no significant differences in baseline demographics, stone volume, or operative time. The saline-restricted group had a shorter hospital length of stay (0.9 ± 0.3 days vs. 1.8 ± 1.8, p = 0.0462), and lower postoperative day 1 creatinine (0.9 ± 0.3 mg/dL vs. 1.3 ± 0.5 mg/dL, p = 0.026). Postoperative hemoglobin, hematocrit, residual stone burden, and residual stone grades were similar between groups.
conclusionPCNL performed under saline-restriction significantly reduced irrigation volume without adversely affecting early postoperative outcomes or residual stone burden. These findings support judicious saline use during PCNL, particularly in times of supply shortage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42323772What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.