Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42323800›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2026

Updating unanswered questions for stillbirth research: refresh of the UK Stillbirth Priority Setting Partnership.

A E P Heazell, N Sobolewski, E Aalai, S W Glover, K Wolffs, C Storey, Stillbirth Priority Setting Partnership Steering Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A E P HeazellMaternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4303-7845
N SobolewskiMaternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
E AalaiLibrary Service, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
S W GloverLibrary Service, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
K WolffsJames Lind Alliance, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9838-5396
C StoreyInternational Rainbow Clinic Network, Manchester, UK.
Stillbirth Priority Setting Partnership Steering Group

Funding

Tommys
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDespite UK targets to reduce stillbirth, there has been comparatively less research focused on stillbirth than on other pregnancy complications. This study aimed to ensure that future research addresses the most important contemporary questions regarding stillbirth by updating the 2015 UK Stillbirth Priority Setting Partnership (PSP), in accordance with the James Lind Alliance (JLA), in collaboration with over 30 professional and stakeholder organizations.

methodsThe Stillbirth PSP was accepted by the JLA for a refreshed list of priorities in June 2024, and a steering group was formed. A survey was then developed in English to identify potential research questions regarding stillbirth and perinatal death in the UK. The initial survey was open from 3 February 2025 to 7 April 2025, during which professionals and people affected by stillbirth were invited to submit research questions relating to either the causes, impact, prevention or management of stillbirth or pregnancy loss after 20 weeks' gestation. The questionnaire was publicized via social media and by stakeholder organizations. Participants' responses were analyzed, duplicate or out-of-scope questions were removed, and indicative questions were formulated from those submitted. Literature searches were carried out in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PsychInfo to identify which of the submitted questions had been answered in previously published work. The remaining unanswered research questions were carried forward into a second prioritization survey, which was hosted online from 15 September 2025 to 16 October 2025. The research questions at the highest priority level were determined by consensus at a face-to-face workshop in November 2025, involving participants with lived experience and healthcare professionals.

resultsThe initial survey received 1261 responses from 525 participants. A further 24 research questions were identified from 10 clinical practice guidelines. Of these 1285 questions, 120 were out of scope. After removing duplicates and combining responses, there were 89 indicative questions. Literature searches determined that 10 questions had been answered previously. The remaining 79 questions were carried forward into the second prioritization survey and were ranked by 441 participants. The top 26 questions were taken to the face-to-face workshop, which prioritized 12 research questions by consensus. The prioritized topics for future research included prediction, prevention, understanding of the causes and management of stillbirth.

conclusionsThis updated Stillbirth PSP indicates that researchers should prioritize studies addressing the identified research priorities, because these reflect the most important research questions for those affected by stillbirth and frontline professionals. © 2026 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchHealth PrioritiesStillbirthFemaleHumansPerinatal DeathPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdombiomedical researchfetal deathfetal demisehealth prioritiesperinatal deathpregnancy outcomepublic involvement

Identifiers

PMID42323800
PMCPMC13432989

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.