ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2026
[Comparative study on effectiveness of bioinductive patch-augmented arthroscopic rotator cuff repair].
Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of using a bioinductive patch on tendon healing, functional recovery, and safety in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods: A non-concurrent controlled study with prospective enrollment of the intervention group and retrospective collection of the control group was conducted. Patients with rotator cuff injuries admitted between June 2024 and March 2025 were enrolled. The sample size was calculated using G*Power software. A total of 60 patients meeting the selection criteria were enrolled, including 30 patients in the patch group (receiving arthroscopic rotator cuff repair combined with bioinductive patch implantation) and 30 patients in the control group (receiving arthroscopic rotator cuff repair only). There was no significant difference between groups ( Results: Incisions in both groups healed by first intention. All patients were followed up, with follow-up time of (13.0±1.8) months in the patch group and (12.8±1.9) months in the control group, showing no significant difference ( Conclusion: The bioinductive patch can effectively promote joint functional recovery and structural improvement after rotator cuff repair with good safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.