ArticleHeredity2026
It is hard to be small: Inbreeding depression on male breeding success depends on body size in a threatened songbird.
Article in Heredity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While inbreeding is known to affect individual fitness and thus population extinction risk, studies often under-represent non-model species of conservation concern and rarely examine the conditionality of inbreeding depression. Here, using genomic markers (SNPs), we determined inbreeding depression in a threatened bird, the aquatic warbler Acrocephalus paludicola - a habitat specialist with depleted genetic diversity that went through a steep recent decline. We also explored whether the magnitude of inbreeding depression depends on phenotypic (tarsus and wing length) and environmental (timing of breeding and brood size) factors. In adult males, the relationship between genomic inbreeding and breeding success depended on tarsus length, a proxy for body size, being strongly negative in small-tarsus males. We also detected a weak interaction effect between genomic inbreeding and wing length on male survival, with short-winged males being negatively affected by inbreeding. By contrast, models that did not include these interactions provided little evidence for inbreeding effects on male fitness, and estimates of inbreeding load were highly uncertain for both survival and breeding success. In adult females, we found little support for associations between genomic inbreeding and clutch size, hatching success, nestling survival, or fledged brood size, and no evidence that these relationships were conditional on the phenotypic and environmental variables examined. Accordingly, estimates of inbreeding load in females were close to zero. We conclude that inbreeding depression on fitness components is phenotype-dependent, being stronger in small-bodied males, and that considering interactions with phenotypic variables enables more accurate estimation of inbreeding depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.