Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42325279›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

Machine learning-based detection of workplace stress using wearable and multimodal data: a systematic literature review.

Luis Fernando Pareja Bernal, Souhir Ben Souissi, Christoph Golz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luis Fernando Pareja BernalApplied Machine Intelligence Research Group, School of Engineering and Computer Science, Bern University of Applied Science, Biel/Bern, Switzerland.
Souhir Ben SouissiApplied Machine Intelligence Research Group, School of Engineering and Computer Science, Bern University of Applied Science, Biel/Bern, Switzerland.
Christoph GolzApplied Research and Development in Nursing, School of Health Professions, Bern University of Applied Science, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Workplace stress is a significant concern, as it negatively impacts employee wellbeing and organizational productivity and is a major contributor to burnout and job turnover. Detecting stress in real-world work environments remains challenging; however, recent advances in machine learning and deep learning techniques offer promising solutions. Furthermore, the growing availability of multimodal data and wearable sensor technologies may facilitate individual stress tracking. In this paper, a systematic literature review is presented, focusing on machine learning and deep learning approaches for detecting workplace stress using wearable and multimodal data: (a) suggested machine learning and deep learning techniques are considered, (b) dataset characteristics and the sensor modalities employed are examined, (c) detection performance is reviewed, (d) workplace contexts and professional domains are discussed, and (e) gaps and future research directions are identified. The 20 selected studies show that machine learning and deep learning models applied to physiological, behavioral, and multimodal data can effectively detect workplace stress, particularly in high-risk occupations. However, limitations such as small sample sizes, limited dataset diversity, and minimal use of central nervous system signals (e.g., electroencephalogram) remain.

Indexed as

deep learningmachine learningmultimodal datastress detectionwearable datawork related stress

Identifiers

PMID42325279
PMCPMC13279608

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.