ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Correlation between prognostic nutritional index and oral mucositis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma treated with almonertinib: a multicenter prospective study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral mucositis (OM) is a common adverse reaction to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), and severe cases can impair patient compliance and quality of life. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) comprehensively reflects an individual's nutritional and immune status and has been applied in lung cancer prognosis studies. However, its relationship with treatment-related OM associated with EGFR-TKI remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the correlation between PNI and the occurrence of OM in patients with lung adenocarcinoma treated with almonertinib. Methods: This study is a multicenter, prospective observational study. From May 2025 to September 2025, 14,039 patients were assessed for eligibility on the unified platform; 537 met the eligibility criteria and had complete baseline data for analysis. Baseline clinical and laboratory data were collected, and PNI was calculated as 5 × lymphocyte count (10 Results: During follow-up, 14.5% of patients developed OM. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that for each 1-unit increase in PNI, the risk of OM decreased by approximately 1.4% (OR = 0.986, 95% CI: 0.972-1.000). Trend analysis results indicate that patients with high PNI levels exhibit a significantly reduced risk of developing OM ( Conclusion: Low PNI levels are independently associated with a significantly increased risk of OM. As a simple, cost-effective, and readily accessible indicator, PNI holds promise as a valuable tool for early risk stratification and personalized management in patients with EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma, providing guidance for optimizing targeted therapy throughout the treatment journey.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.