Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42325608›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Phase 2 study of regorafenib in patients with progressive glioblastoma after failure of bevacizumab.

Alyssa Lucas, David Peereboom, Yasmeen Rauf, Hong Li, Joshua Hanlon, Manmeet Ahluwalia

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04051606 (Regorafenib in Bevacizumab Refractory Recurrent Glioblastoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04051606 phase2completednot on this map

Regorafenib in Bevacizumab Refractory Recurrent Glioblastoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorCase Comprehensive Cancer CenterRan2019 to 2024Enrolled14ConditionsRecurrent GlioblastomaArmsRegorafenib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alyssa LucasRose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3308-0648
David PeereboomLerner Research Institute Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7798-5176
Yasmeen RaufRose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3849-7150
Hong LiLerner Research Institute Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9593-919X
Joshua HanlonRose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Manmeet AhluwaliaRose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3794-9511

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Treatment options in progressive glioblastoma (GBM) are limited, especially in patients who have experienced disease progression while receiving bevacizumab therapy. This phase 2 study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib monotherapy in patients with GBM. Methods: Eligible patients had radiographic progression of histologically confirmed GBM following second- or third-line bevacizumab therapy. They received regorafenib monotherapy using the dose escalation strategy demonstrated in the ReDOS phase 2 clinical trial evaluating regorafenib in metastatic colon cancer. The target dose was 160 mg once daily, administered for 3 weeks on/1 week off in 28-day cycles. Patients underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) every 8 weeks and were assessed via modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. Patients continued treatment with regorafenib therapy until they experienced progression or excessive toxicity. Results: Based on the analysis of 13 enrolled patients, there were no responses and 12 of 13 (92.3%) had progressive disease on brain MRI; 1 patient went off study due to an adverse event occurring before assessment. The median overall survival (OS) was 4.1 months (95% CI 2.0-7.3). The OS at 12 months was 23% (0.2-46). The PFS at both 3 and 6 months was 7.7% (0.0-22.2%) with a median PFS of 1.0 month, (0.4-1.8). There was a total of 14 Grade 3 or 4 AEs and no Grade 5 AEs. Conclusions: Regorafenib did not improve OS or PFS in bevacizumab-refractory recurrent glioblastoma. The study was halted early due to futility. Trial Registration: NCT04051606.

Indexed as

anti-angiogenesisbevacizumab-refractory glioblastomaglioblastomaregorafenibtargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID42325608
PMCPMC13275312

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.