Evidence mapPaperPMID 42325667Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026

Prognostic significance of stress hyperglycemia ratio in coronary microvascular dysfunction among chronic coronary syndrome patients.

Jiasuer Alifu, Hailipai Mamuti, Yongqiang Luo, Chunyue Wang, Wen Zhang, Penglong Qi, Abdul-Quddus Mohammed, Lu Liu, Guoqing Yin, Xian Lv and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06698432 (Prognostic Implications of Stress Hyperglycemia Ratio for the Prognosis of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06698432 completednot on this map

Prognostic Implications of Stress Hyperglycemia Ratio for the Prognosis of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome

TypeobservationalSponsorYa-Wei XuRan2015 to 2019Enrolled379ConditionsCoronary Microvascular Dysfunction (CMD), Index of Microvascular Resistance, Chronic Coronary Syndrome, PrognosisArmscaIMR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jiasuer Alifu *Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Hailipai Mamuti *Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yongqiang Luo *Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Chunyue WangDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wen ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Penglong QiDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Abdul-Quddus MohammedDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Lu LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Guoqing YinDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xian LvDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Tingting ShiDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Fuad A AbduDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wenliang CheDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a crucial prognostic indicator in chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) patients. The stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR), a novel biomarker of acute hyperglycemia, has demonstrated predictive value for adverse outcomes in various diseases. However, its association with CMD remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic role of SHR in predicting CMD outcomes in CCS patients. Methods: CCS patients who underwent coronary angiography (CAG) were included. Microvascular function was assessed using coronary angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (caIMR), with CMD defined as caIMR > 25U. Patients were divided into three groups based on SHR values: T1 (SHR < 0.73), T2 (SHR 0.73-0.80), and T3 (SHR≥0.80). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Results: 379 CCS patients were included, among which 196 were identified with CMD. The CMD group exhibited higher SHR levels. During a mean follow-up of 32.9 months, 53 MACE events occurred in CMD patients, with a higher incidence in the T3 group compared to the T1/T2 groups (37.681% vs. 16.667% vs. 26.230%, Conclusions: Elevated SHR is associated with adverse outcomes and predicts MACE in CMD patients with CCS. These results highlight the potential of SHR as a valuable tool for early risk stratification and prevention in CMD management. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06698432 (Registration Date: November 19, 2024).

Indexed as

chronic coronary syndromecoronary microvascular dysfunctionmortalityprognosisstress hyperglycemia ratio

Identifiers

PMID42325667
PMCPMC13275362

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.