ArticleEuropean urology open science2026
Early Efficacy and Exploratory Biomarker Data of Bel-sar in Patients with Intermediate-risk and High-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.
Article in European urology open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Despite available therapies, patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) are impacted by recurrence and progression risk. Bel-sar (belzupacap sarotalocan) is a first-in-class virus-like drug conjugate composed of a tumor-targeting virus-like particle linked to a photoactivatable dye, inducing proimmunogenic tumor cell death and antitumor immune response. We report clinical and exploratory immune biomarker data from a phase 1 study in intermediate-risk and high-risk NMIBC. Methods: Seventeen participants received focally injected bel-sar (100-200 µg) without ( Key findings and limitations: Bel-sar was well tolerated, with only grade 1 adverse events, and no grade ≥2, serious, or dose-limiting toxicities. Among 10 efficacy-evaluable patients receiving light activation, four of five low-grade tumors achieved complete response. Responses were also observed in high-grade and untreated tumors, suggesting a urothelial field effect. Immune profiling demonstrated conversion of immune-cold or exhausted tumors into immunogenically primed tumors, with tertiary lymphoid structure formation, expansion of cytotoxic and memory CD4+ T cells, and marked natural killer cells and eosinophils recruitment. Limitations include the small sample size and short follow-up. Conclusions and clinical implications: Bel-sar demonstrated focal administration feasibility, a favorable safety profile, and encouraging preliminary efficacy in NMIBC, with robust immune activation in treated and untreated tumors. These findings support bel-sar's continued development as a therapy combining local tumor eradication with durable immune surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.