ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2026
Integrating Network Pharmacology and Clinical Observation to Elucidate the Therapeutic Mechanisms of Yangzheng Xiaoji Decoction in Primary Liver Cancer.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research Progress on Biomaterial Scaffolds Carrying Stem Cells for Inflammation Regulation After Spinal Cord Injury.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Primary liver cancer (PLC) is a leading cause of global cancer mortality. Yangzheng Xiaoji Decoction (YZXJD), a traditional Chinese medicine based on "Fuzheng Xiaoji" principles, is used as adjunctive PLC therapy, yet its underlying molecular mechanisms require further characterization. Methods: Active compounds from 13 herbs were retrieved via the Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology (TCMSP) database (OB ≥ 30%, DL ≥ 0.18). After identifying drug-disease target intersections, a compound-target-disease network was constructed using Cytoscape. PPI, GO, and KEGG analyses were performed. Concurrently, 40 patients with PLC were assigned, in a non-randomized prospective controlled design, to conventional therapy (control, n=20) or conventional therapy plus YZXJD (observation, n=20) for 4 weeks. Biochemical markers (AFP, AST, ALT, ALB, PT) and TCM syndrome scores were evaluated. Results: Network pharmacology identified 195 active compounds and 135 potential therapeutic targets. PPI screening revealed 25 core targets, with GRM5, TRPA1, ADRA1D, GRIA2, and NPY2R showing the highest connectivity. GO analysis yielded 215 enriched terms, while KEGG analysis highlighted 14 pathways, notably neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction and cGMP-PKG signaling. Clinically, both groups showed within-group reductions in AST, ALT, and AFP, but under a Bonferroni-adjusted threshold (P < 0.01) the between-group advantage for the observation group was most clearly evident for prothrombin time (PT), which improved in the observation group while it worsened in the control group. TCM syndrome scores decreased significantly in the observation group (P < 0.001) but worsened in the control group (P = 0.004). The total effective rate was 80.0% in the observation group versus 65.0% in controls (P = 0.048). Conclusion: Network pharmacology suggests that YZXJD may act against PLC through multi-component, multi-pathway mechanisms. In this preliminary, non-randomized observation, the addition of YZXJD was associated with improvements in hepatic function markers, serum AFP, and symptom burden. These findings are hypothesis-generating; the computational predictions and clinical signals require confirmation in adequately powered, randomized, and experimentally validated studies before YZXJD can be recommended for routine integration into PLC management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.